Press Release: February 2007 Archives
Stem cell research is one such area where the world does not have a unanimous decision and where some people are against it, some are in favor of it and others simply don’t know what to do. The controversy associated with embryonic stem cell research is with regards to the destruction of the embryo when cells are extracted and though embryos are being used for inâ€"vitro fertility treatment there are a number of people who are opposed to stem cell research on the basis that embryos are just the start of human life.
People who are for embryonic stem cell researches state that embryo should not be given the same importance as the fetus and though they agree that embryos are being destroyed but they further say that the benefits offered are far more when compared to the downside.
<a href="http://www.biotechblog.org/entry/stem-cell-research-when-will-the-controversy-end/">Stem Cell Research: When Will the Controversy End? </a> (biotechblog.org)
People who are for embryonic stem cell researches state that embryo should not be given the same importance as the fetus and though they agree that embryos are being destroyed but they further say that the benefits offered are far more when compared to the downside.
<a href="http://www.biotechblog.org/entry/stem-cell-research-when-will-the-controversy-end/">Stem Cell Research: When Will the Controversy End? </a> (biotechblog.org)
California's $3 billion stem cell agency withstood another challenge to its constitutionality when a state appeals court rejected claims by abortion foes and anti-tax advocates that the agency's managers had conflicts of interest.
The 1st District Court of Appeal upheld a decision by a lower court judge who last year ruled in favor of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, which was created when Proposition 71 was passed by 59 percent of the electorate in 2004.
Opponents of the stem cell agency said after Monday's ruling that they likely would appeal to the state Supreme Court.
Until the lawsuits are resolved, the agency can't borrow any money from Wall Street bond dealers. The state has loaned the agency $150 million, and philanthropic organizations have loaned it another $45 million to fund research.
<a href="http://www.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=109036">Appeals court upholds California stem cell agency, rejects conflict of interest claims</a> (broadcastnewsroom.com)
The 1st District Court of Appeal upheld a decision by a lower court judge who last year ruled in favor of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, which was created when Proposition 71 was passed by 59 percent of the electorate in 2004.
Opponents of the stem cell agency said after Monday's ruling that they likely would appeal to the state Supreme Court.
Until the lawsuits are resolved, the agency can't borrow any money from Wall Street bond dealers. The state has loaned the agency $150 million, and philanthropic organizations have loaned it another $45 million to fund research.
<a href="http://www.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=109036">Appeals court upholds California stem cell agency, rejects conflict of interest claims</a> (broadcastnewsroom.com)
The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (formed when Prop 71 passed in 2004) funding has been tied up in lawsuits brought by anti-abortion activists since 2005. But today, the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco rejected (here's the opinion: Download opinion_affirming_02272007.pdf) the groups' claims that the stem cell measure is unconstitutional.
The $45 million in grant money recently distributed by CIRM was drawn from a $150 state loan authorized last year by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Robert Klein, chair of the Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee of CIRM, issued a statement; the transcript is after the jump. In it he says the CIRM will approve up to $80 million more in stem cell grants later this month.
We are very pleased with today’s ruling from the California Court of Appeal. Once again, the judiciary has upheld the Constitutionality of California’s innovative stem cell research project â€" in its entirety, without equivocation, and with absolutely no room for further argument. We are grateful that the Court rendered this decision so quickly, as it speeds the day when the will of 7 million voters can be fully realized.
<a href="http://blog.wired.com/biotech/2007/02/ca_stem_cell_in.html">CA Stem Cell Institute Wins Lawsuit</a> (wired.com)
The $45 million in grant money recently distributed by CIRM was drawn from a $150 state loan authorized last year by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Robert Klein, chair of the Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee of CIRM, issued a statement; the transcript is after the jump. In it he says the CIRM will approve up to $80 million more in stem cell grants later this month.
We are very pleased with today’s ruling from the California Court of Appeal. Once again, the judiciary has upheld the Constitutionality of California’s innovative stem cell research project â€" in its entirety, without equivocation, and with absolutely no room for further argument. We are grateful that the Court rendered this decision so quickly, as it speeds the day when the will of 7 million voters can be fully realized.
<a href="http://blog.wired.com/biotech/2007/02/ca_stem_cell_in.html">CA Stem Cell Institute Wins Lawsuit</a> (wired.com)
A state appeals court in San Francisco today upheld the constitutionality of California's $3 billion voter-approved stem cell research program.
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld a decision in which Alameda County Superior Court Judge Bonnie Sabraw ruled last year that the structure of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine didn't violate the California constitution.
The establishment of the stem cell research institute was approved as Proposition 71 by state voters in 2004.
Court of Appeal Justice Stuart Pollak wrote, "After careful consideration of all of appellants' legal objections, we have no hesitation in concluding... that Proposition 71 suffers from no constitutional or other infirmity."
The program was challenged in two separate lawsuits by two taxpayer groups and a bioethics organization. (clo)
<a href="http://kcbs.com/pages/267181.php?contentType=4&contentId=349443">Court Upholds California's Stem Cell Research Program</a> (kcbs.com)
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld a decision in which Alameda County Superior Court Judge Bonnie Sabraw ruled last year that the structure of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine didn't violate the California constitution.
The establishment of the stem cell research institute was approved as Proposition 71 by state voters in 2004.
Court of Appeal Justice Stuart Pollak wrote, "After careful consideration of all of appellants' legal objections, we have no hesitation in concluding... that Proposition 71 suffers from no constitutional or other infirmity."
The program was challenged in two separate lawsuits by two taxpayer groups and a bioethics organization. (clo)
<a href="http://kcbs.com/pages/267181.php?contentType=4&contentId=349443">Court Upholds California's Stem Cell Research Program</a> (kcbs.com)
<a href="http://www.evtv1.com/player.aspx?itemnum=5501">Michael J. Fox on Stem Cell Research </a> (evtv1.com)
A proposal to legalize embryonic stem cell research and use public tax dollars to pay for it appears to be well on its way to becoming law in Illinois. Senate Bill 4 is now halfway through the legislative process with the approval of the Illinois Senate Friday.
State Senator John O. Jones, who voted no, says for him the issue comes down to protecting innocent life. He says adult stem cell research is moving forward and helping people but the bill took into account embryonic stem cell and his feeling is they are sacrificing the possibility of a life in order to do that.
Jones says another major problem with the proposal is the use of public tax dollars to fund the research to the tune of 125-million dollars. The Senate approved the bill by a 35-23 vote. The measure now heads to the House for consideration.
<a href="http://wjbdradio.com/news_view.asp?WEBID=8301">Jones opposes lealization of embryonic stem cell research funded by public tax dollars</a> (wjbdradio.com)
State Senator John O. Jones, who voted no, says for him the issue comes down to protecting innocent life. He says adult stem cell research is moving forward and helping people but the bill took into account embryonic stem cell and his feeling is they are sacrificing the possibility of a life in order to do that.
Jones says another major problem with the proposal is the use of public tax dollars to fund the research to the tune of 125-million dollars. The Senate approved the bill by a 35-23 vote. The measure now heads to the House for consideration.
<a href="http://wjbdradio.com/news_view.asp?WEBID=8301">Jones opposes lealization of embryonic stem cell research funded by public tax dollars</a> (wjbdradio.com)
The Illinois Senate approved a bill which will appropriate state funds for embryonic stem cell research. SB 4, sponsored by Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, would allow scientists to work with embryonic stem cells in order to discover treatments for many diseases, including diabetes and Alzheimer’s. The bill formalizes a stem cell research program developed by Gov. Blagojevich in July 2005. For more information, see CPA’s Stem Cell policy briefing and model legislation.
<a href="http://www.stateaction.org/blog/?p=486">Illinois Senate Oks Stem Cell Research</a> (stateaction.org)
<a href="http://www.stateaction.org/blog/?p=486">Illinois Senate Oks Stem Cell Research</a> (stateaction.org)
Some legislators want to break the limits that have held back scientists in the state from doing embryonic stem cell research.
Michigan is one of several states to restrict such research, including work with live and cloned embryos.
A stem cell is one with a self-renewal capacity and the potential to produce any type of cell in the body.
James Trosko, a professor in the Pediatrics and Human Development Department at Michigan State University, said researchers can work with adult stem cells, but there are limitations.
"When a researcher is able to work with embryonic stem cells, they would be dealing with all of the body's human cells, which would be close to 200 cells," Trosko said. "With an adult's stem cells, a researcher can only get a limited amount because stem cells die as a person gets older."
Last week, The Associated Press reported that a scientific panel found flaws in earlier research that showed adult stem cells have promise.
<a href="http://www.lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070225/NEWS01/702250599/1001/news">Lawmakers want to lift embryonic stem cell limits</a> (lsj.com)
Michigan is one of several states to restrict such research, including work with live and cloned embryos.
A stem cell is one with a self-renewal capacity and the potential to produce any type of cell in the body.
James Trosko, a professor in the Pediatrics and Human Development Department at Michigan State University, said researchers can work with adult stem cells, but there are limitations.
"When a researcher is able to work with embryonic stem cells, they would be dealing with all of the body's human cells, which would be close to 200 cells," Trosko said. "With an adult's stem cells, a researcher can only get a limited amount because stem cells die as a person gets older."
Last week, The Associated Press reported that a scientific panel found flaws in earlier research that showed adult stem cells have promise.
<a href="http://www.lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070225/NEWS01/702250599/1001/news">Lawmakers want to lift embryonic stem cell limits</a> (lsj.com)
A lawmaker used a House committee hearing on embryonic stem cell research funding Thursday to challenge a University of Minnesota scientist on whether her work violates state law.
Rep. Dan Severson, R-Sauk Rapids, said a 1973 state statute on human research appears to make embryonic research by the U's Meri Firpo illegal.
"I think in this particular case the experiments Mrs. Firpo is doing are a gross misdemeanor," he said.
Firpo responded that she has been assured by U leaders that embryonic stem cell research is permitted under that statute, and a research analyst for the higher education and work force development committee said the statute applies to a relatively narrow definition of human life.
The exchange nonetheless marked an often-tense hearing in which opponents challenged the morality of spending state tax dollars on embryonic stem cell research. The prolonged debate forced the committee to delay a vote until it meets again Tuesday.
<a href="http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/living/16762293.htm">Minnesota Legislature / Legislator challenges U stem cell scientist</a> (JEREMY OLSON, twincities.com)
Rep. Dan Severson, R-Sauk Rapids, said a 1973 state statute on human research appears to make embryonic research by the U's Meri Firpo illegal.
"I think in this particular case the experiments Mrs. Firpo is doing are a gross misdemeanor," he said.
Firpo responded that she has been assured by U leaders that embryonic stem cell research is permitted under that statute, and a research analyst for the higher education and work force development committee said the statute applies to a relatively narrow definition of human life.
The exchange nonetheless marked an often-tense hearing in which opponents challenged the morality of spending state tax dollars on embryonic stem cell research. The prolonged debate forced the committee to delay a vote until it meets again Tuesday.
<a href="http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/living/16762293.htm">Minnesota Legislature / Legislator challenges U stem cell scientist</a> (JEREMY OLSON, twincities.com)
Confirming what many other national conservative sources have been saying for months, the James Hartline Report has now uncovered new evidence which indicates that the pro-life "make-over" of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney is nothing more than a cover for an extremely radical and liberal philosophy.
A San Diego Republican Party operative recently contacted the James Hartline Report with a list of influential Romney supporters who are hosting a March 16, 2007 San Diego fundraiser for Romney's presidential campaign. After thoroughly investigating the backgrounds of a number of those who are hosting the Romney fundraiser in San Diego, the James Hartline Report has obtained information which may send political shockwaves throughout GOP circles and could permanently affect the outcome of the presidential race.
<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1789638/posts">Embryonic Stem Cell Research Financier Joins Pro-Gay Fundraiser To Host Mitt Romney San Diego Event</a> (freerepublic.com)
A San Diego Republican Party operative recently contacted the James Hartline Report with a list of influential Romney supporters who are hosting a March 16, 2007 San Diego fundraiser for Romney's presidential campaign. After thoroughly investigating the backgrounds of a number of those who are hosting the Romney fundraiser in San Diego, the James Hartline Report has obtained information which may send political shockwaves throughout GOP circles and could permanently affect the outcome of the presidential race.
<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1789638/posts">Embryonic Stem Cell Research Financier Joins Pro-Gay Fundraiser To Host Mitt Romney San Diego Event</a> (freerepublic.com)
The House approved a proposal Thursday night to ease Iowa's restrictions on stem cell research, sending the measure to Gov. Chet Culver.
If signed into law, House File 287 would eliminate the state's ban on creating human embryos. The House approved the measure 52-46. Last week, the Senate approved a version of the bill 26-24.
Bogged down by several amendments and intense feelings on both sides of the issue, debate lasted for several hours.
Debate included a fair amount of rhetorical and semantical arguments, as well as high emotions. One amendment, proposed by Rep. Jodi Tymeson, R-Winterset, would have changed the bill's name from the "Iowa Stem Cell Research Cures Initiative'' to the "Human Cloning Repeal and Embryonic Stem Cell Research Authorization Act.''
Tymeson argued that the bill would amount to a repeal of Iowa's ban on human cloning, an argument that many Democrats reject.
"If you look at the bill itself, it prohibits human reproductive cloning,'' said Rep. Lisa Heddens, D-Ames. "The bill is written correctly.''
Some Democrats have also claimed that easing the restrictions on stem cell research could help scientists find cures for diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer.
<a href="http://www.woi-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6130074&nav=1LFX">House Passes Stem Cell Research Bill</a> (woi-tv.com)
If signed into law, House File 287 would eliminate the state's ban on creating human embryos. The House approved the measure 52-46. Last week, the Senate approved a version of the bill 26-24.
Bogged down by several amendments and intense feelings on both sides of the issue, debate lasted for several hours.
Debate included a fair amount of rhetorical and semantical arguments, as well as high emotions. One amendment, proposed by Rep. Jodi Tymeson, R-Winterset, would have changed the bill's name from the "Iowa Stem Cell Research Cures Initiative'' to the "Human Cloning Repeal and Embryonic Stem Cell Research Authorization Act.''
Tymeson argued that the bill would amount to a repeal of Iowa's ban on human cloning, an argument that many Democrats reject.
"If you look at the bill itself, it prohibits human reproductive cloning,'' said Rep. Lisa Heddens, D-Ames. "The bill is written correctly.''
Some Democrats have also claimed that easing the restrictions on stem cell research could help scientists find cures for diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer.
<a href="http://www.woi-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6130074&nav=1LFX">House Passes Stem Cell Research Bill</a> (woi-tv.com)
Legislation advancing Wednesday in the Illinois Senate would promote research into all types of stem cells - including embryonic - while banning human cloning.
Senate Bill 4, which passed a committee, also would set penalties for the sale of tissue used in research and would establish a system where those awarding and receiving research grants would have to publicly disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
“This is one of the most compelling and important moral issues facing those of us in the public arena today,†the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, D-Evanston, told fellow members of the Senate Public Health Committee.
“There is great potential for cures to be realized†in such medical conditions as Alzheimer’s disease, juvenile diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and other ailments, he said.
House Republican Leader Tom Cross of Oswego has introduced similar legislation, HB138, that could be heard in a committee in that chamber as early as today.
<a href="http://www.sj-r.com/sections/news/stories/108434.asp">Bill in Senate would support all types of stem-cell research </a> (DANA HEUPEL, sj-r.com)
Senate Bill 4, which passed a committee, also would set penalties for the sale of tissue used in research and would establish a system where those awarding and receiving research grants would have to publicly disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
“This is one of the most compelling and important moral issues facing those of us in the public arena today,†the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, D-Evanston, told fellow members of the Senate Public Health Committee.
“There is great potential for cures to be realized†in such medical conditions as Alzheimer’s disease, juvenile diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and other ailments, he said.
House Republican Leader Tom Cross of Oswego has introduced similar legislation, HB138, that could be heard in a committee in that chamber as early as today.
<a href="http://www.sj-r.com/sections/news/stories/108434.asp">Bill in Senate would support all types of stem-cell research </a> (DANA HEUPEL, sj-r.com)
Iowans on both sides of the debate over stem cell research using human embryos spoke out during a public hearing at the statehouse last night. Gary Mechtensimer of Solon arrived in a wheelchair wearing a button that read "Help us find the cures."
"I just wish that they could realize how many people they would help because I myself have a spinal cord injury plus I had a stroke last March," he said. "If they could do something to help...I personally know that side of it and it's not a fun thing."
But Archbishop Jerome Hanus of Dubuque, the top Catholic official in Iowa, told lawmakers his faith teaches that all human life is precious, even a cloned embryo. "Let's listen to what the scientists say, and I can give you dozens and dozens of scientists...on the website (www.stemcellresearch.org) where there are 70 reputable scientists -- very few from Catholic institutions, almost all from secular institutions -- which say there is no doubt that this is human life," Hanus said. "So this is not a question that comes from belief, it's a question that comes from science. This is human life."
<a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=E9F3ADC0-D753-A61B-084F80C5BD0A5F9E">Iowans speak out at hearing on stem cell research</a> (radioiowa.com)
"I just wish that they could realize how many people they would help because I myself have a spinal cord injury plus I had a stroke last March," he said. "If they could do something to help...I personally know that side of it and it's not a fun thing."
But Archbishop Jerome Hanus of Dubuque, the top Catholic official in Iowa, told lawmakers his faith teaches that all human life is precious, even a cloned embryo. "Let's listen to what the scientists say, and I can give you dozens and dozens of scientists...on the website (www.stemcellresearch.org) where there are 70 reputable scientists -- very few from Catholic institutions, almost all from secular institutions -- which say there is no doubt that this is human life," Hanus said. "So this is not a question that comes from belief, it's a question that comes from science. This is human life."
<a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=E9F3ADC0-D753-A61B-084F80C5BD0A5F9E">Iowans speak out at hearing on stem cell research</a> (radioiowa.com)
Supporters for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney gathered for his fundraising event held in Salt Lake City. Among those was U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch.
Though it's early, hot-button issues are already being discussed among Republicans, and not everyone is in agreement.
Romney says he favors adult, but not embryonic, stem cell research. Mitt Romney is not opposed to research unless it involves using in-vitro fertilized eggs.
He has personal interest in stem cell research. Scientists believe the research could lead to cures for diseases like multiple sclerosis, which his wife, Ann, suffers from. He says he wants to see more development in adult stem cell research and avoid the moral issues of using cells from embryos.
Orrin Hatch, U.S. Senator: "He thinks he can get everything done with adult stem cells. I hope that is true."
<a href="http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=915680">Romney Supports Adult, Not Embryonic Stem Cell Research</a> (Ashley Hayes, ksl.com)
Though it's early, hot-button issues are already being discussed among Republicans, and not everyone is in agreement.
Romney says he favors adult, but not embryonic, stem cell research. Mitt Romney is not opposed to research unless it involves using in-vitro fertilized eggs.
He has personal interest in stem cell research. Scientists believe the research could lead to cures for diseases like multiple sclerosis, which his wife, Ann, suffers from. He says he wants to see more development in adult stem cell research and avoid the moral issues of using cells from embryos.
Orrin Hatch, U.S. Senator: "He thinks he can get everything done with adult stem cells. I hope that is true."
<a href="http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=915680">Romney Supports Adult, Not Embryonic Stem Cell Research</a> (Ashley Hayes, ksl.com)
Should stem cell researchers be allowed to recruit women to donate their eggs for medical research in return for compensation payments? We want YOUR views.
The process can cause fertility problems and involves women taking hormones that boost egg production, carrying the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation. This can cause kidney damage and even death.
Concerns have been raised that women could be tempted into making donations to receive expenses of £250.
Send your views to yourstory@itv.com
<a href="http://www.itv.com/news/26915b6d2293962095df344fa86c1e59.html">Stem cell research - we want YOUR views</a> (itv.com)
The process can cause fertility problems and involves women taking hormones that boost egg production, carrying the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation. This can cause kidney damage and even death.
Concerns have been raised that women could be tempted into making donations to receive expenses of £250.
Send your views to yourstory@itv.com
<a href="http://www.itv.com/news/26915b6d2293962095df344fa86c1e59.html">Stem cell research - we want YOUR views</a> (itv.com)
Pro-life activists are urging President Bush to use his veto powers to once again shoot down a congressional effort to expand federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, if lawmakers succeed in their bid later this year.
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) reintroduced legislation Jan. 4 that would allow for increased federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Similar legislation passed both houses of Congress in 2006 but was defeated by Bush's first and only use of the presidential veto.
Federal funding is currently restricted to research on a limited number of embryonic stem cell colonies that existed before Aug. 9, 2001. The proposed measures would expand that to finance clinical research on human embryos that have been left over from in vitro fertilization treatment.
"We're expecting a presidential veto if this bill passes, since this is what happened last summer and the president has reaffirmed his commitment to veto this," Kimberly Zenarolla, executive vice president of the National Pro-Life Action Center (NPLAC), told Cybercast News Service.
<a href="http://www.crosswalk.com/news/11530119/">Pro-Lifers Expect Another Stem Cell Veto</a> (Nathan Burchfiel, crosswalk.com)
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) reintroduced legislation Jan. 4 that would allow for increased federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Similar legislation passed both houses of Congress in 2006 but was defeated by Bush's first and only use of the presidential veto.
Federal funding is currently restricted to research on a limited number of embryonic stem cell colonies that existed before Aug. 9, 2001. The proposed measures would expand that to finance clinical research on human embryos that have been left over from in vitro fertilization treatment.
"We're expecting a presidential veto if this bill passes, since this is what happened last summer and the president has reaffirmed his commitment to veto this," Kimberly Zenarolla, executive vice president of the National Pro-Life Action Center (NPLAC), told Cybercast News Service.
<a href="http://www.crosswalk.com/news/11530119/">Pro-Lifers Expect Another Stem Cell Veto</a> (Nathan Burchfiel, crosswalk.com)
A bill lifting restrictions on a certain type of embryonic stem cell research cleared a House committee Monday on a party-line vote.
Rep. Lisa Heddens, D-Ames, who led debate on the bill in the Human Resources Committee, argued the research holds promise for the treatment of a variety of diseases.
"It is a clear choice between whether or not we're going to offer hope to thousands of Iowans who suffer from debilitating diseases and illnesses. It's a clear choice about whether or not the quality of life of our fellow Iowans who are sick and suffering will be improved," Heddens said.
Republicans argue the bill would roll back Iowa's ban on human cloning procedures. The bill allows researchers to use cloning techniques to create stem sell lines, but backers contend the bill would not allow reproductive cloning.
Rep. Polly Granzow, R-Eldora, said Iowa law already allows both embryonic and adult stem cell research and called the bill unnecessary.
"We do prohibit cloning, and this bill clearly says we will repeal the ban that we have on cloning," Granzow said.
<a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/02/20/news/legislature/daa0a261b96fe3b886257288000d04a4.txt">Stem-cell research passes House panel </a> (siouxcityjournal.com)
Rep. Lisa Heddens, D-Ames, who led debate on the bill in the Human Resources Committee, argued the research holds promise for the treatment of a variety of diseases.
"It is a clear choice between whether or not we're going to offer hope to thousands of Iowans who suffer from debilitating diseases and illnesses. It's a clear choice about whether or not the quality of life of our fellow Iowans who are sick and suffering will be improved," Heddens said.
Republicans argue the bill would roll back Iowa's ban on human cloning procedures. The bill allows researchers to use cloning techniques to create stem sell lines, but backers contend the bill would not allow reproductive cloning.
Rep. Polly Granzow, R-Eldora, said Iowa law already allows both embryonic and adult stem cell research and called the bill unnecessary.
"We do prohibit cloning, and this bill clearly says we will repeal the ban that we have on cloning," Granzow said.
<a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/02/20/news/legislature/daa0a261b96fe3b886257288000d04a4.txt">Stem-cell research passes House panel </a> (siouxcityjournal.com)
With the final vote on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research expected before the Senate next month, the National Pro-Life Action Center (NPLAC) has assembled a panel of experts to discuss the latest developments and debates in the science and ethics of stem cell research. This will be the third stem cell symposium that NPLAC has organized on Capitol Hill. Each symposium has featured different scientists and bioethicists addressing the most recent progress and pitfalls of this controversial new research.
<a href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/802562281.html">National Pro-Life Action Center on Capitol Hill Presents a Stem Cell Research Symposium (A Refresher with the Latest Updates)</a> (christiannewswire.com)
<a href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/802562281.html">National Pro-Life Action Center on Capitol Hill Presents a Stem Cell Research Symposium (A Refresher with the Latest Updates)</a> (christiannewswire.com)
If it was April, I'd say it was an April Fool's joke. But it's February, and it's true -- California is actually distributing funds for human embryonic stem cell research.
The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) on Friday (Feb 16) approved $45 million worth of grants to 20 academic and non-profit California institutions.
The organization remains tied up in never-ending lawsuits, so the money comes from a $150 million loan from the state general's fund authorized by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has publicly supported CIRM.
This round of funding focused on Scientific Excellence through Exploration and Development (SEED) grants, allocated to 30 scientists just entering the field of stem cell research, and 27 others who have spent six or less years as independent investigators. The goal is to "carry out studies that may yield preliminary data or proof-of-principle results that could then be extended to full scale investigations," according to a CIRM statement.
<a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/52856/">Calif. funds stem cell research -- really</a> (Alison McCook, the-scientist.com)
The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) on Friday (Feb 16) approved $45 million worth of grants to 20 academic and non-profit California institutions.
The organization remains tied up in never-ending lawsuits, so the money comes from a $150 million loan from the state general's fund authorized by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has publicly supported CIRM.
This round of funding focused on Scientific Excellence through Exploration and Development (SEED) grants, allocated to 30 scientists just entering the field of stem cell research, and 27 others who have spent six or less years as independent investigators. The goal is to "carry out studies that may yield preliminary data or proof-of-principle results that could then be extended to full scale investigations," according to a CIRM statement.
<a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/52856/">Calif. funds stem cell research -- really</a> (Alison McCook, the-scientist.com)
After giving an interview over the weekend where he discuss his newfound opposition to abortion, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney talked on Monday about embryonic stem cell research, the issue that prompted his pro-life conversion two years ago.
He said he opposes the controversial science, which requires the destruction of human life, even though some say it could yield a cure for his wife, Ann, who suffers from multiple sclerosis.
Romney told the Associated Press he was confident that research using adult stem cells and studies on existing embryonic stem cell lines would yield cures for patients.
"I believe that science is able to receive the stem cells necessary for research through means that don't represent a serious, moral problem," Romney said.
President Bush put a policy in place in August 2001 that prohibits taxpayer funding of any new embryonic stem cell research taking place beyond that point because it would have the government funding the destruction of days-old unborn children.
Romney told AP in the interview that he favors continued funding of the older embryonic stem cells and he would significantly increase federal funds for adult stem cell research. He said it was the most moral and effective alternative.
"It avoids all of the moral concerns and therefore presents scientific opportunity without moral dilemma," he said. "And I found no one to dispute the potential of such avenues of exploration that was able to convince me that these did not have merit."
Last week, Ann Romney said she shares her husbands opposition to embryonic stem cell research.
<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1983.html">Mitt Romney Opposes Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Backs Alternatives </a> (Steven Ertelt, lifenews.com)
He said he opposes the controversial science, which requires the destruction of human life, even though some say it could yield a cure for his wife, Ann, who suffers from multiple sclerosis.
Romney told the Associated Press he was confident that research using adult stem cells and studies on existing embryonic stem cell lines would yield cures for patients.
"I believe that science is able to receive the stem cells necessary for research through means that don't represent a serious, moral problem," Romney said.
President Bush put a policy in place in August 2001 that prohibits taxpayer funding of any new embryonic stem cell research taking place beyond that point because it would have the government funding the destruction of days-old unborn children.
Romney told AP in the interview that he favors continued funding of the older embryonic stem cells and he would significantly increase federal funds for adult stem cell research. He said it was the most moral and effective alternative.
"It avoids all of the moral concerns and therefore presents scientific opportunity without moral dilemma," he said. "And I found no one to dispute the potential of such avenues of exploration that was able to convince me that these did not have merit."
Last week, Ann Romney said she shares her husbands opposition to embryonic stem cell research.
<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1983.html">Mitt Romney Opposes Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Backs Alternatives </a> (Steven Ertelt, lifenews.com)
While listening to NPR early in the morning, there was a analysis of the upcoming California resolution to award State and private grants to promote Stem cell research. Voters approved a $3 billion dollar resolution to fund additional research into the controversial scientific field more than 2 years ago. In the next few months, the beginning of those funds will begin to be distributed to various organizations and science facilities. While the bond measure was passed by the voters, state funds are as of yet unavailable to the measure as a number of anti-abortion and citizens' rights groups have appealed to the courts. The money being distributed currently is from private organizations and philanthropists.
<a href="http://infotechsociallife.blogspot.com/2007/02/california-and-stem-cell-research.html">California and Stem Cell Research</a> (infotechsociallife.blogspot.com)
<a href="http://infotechsociallife.blogspot.com/2007/02/california-and-stem-cell-research.html">California and Stem Cell Research</a> (infotechsociallife.blogspot.com)
A state appeals court held a hearing Wednesday on the lawsuit brought against Proposition 71, the ballot measure that created the state agency that would spend billions of taxpayer dollars on embryonic stem cell research. A judge previously ruled the proposition was constitutional.
Two consumer groups filed a lawsuit against the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine saying it does not have proper oversight from the state on spending its monies, as required by the state constitution.
It also contends the members of the committee were chosen on the basis of their affiliations with certain institutions, not on the basis of their personal qualifications.
The lawsuit resulted in a trial last year in the Alameda County Superior Court, where a judge upheld the proposition. The groups then appealed the case to the First Appellate District.
A three judge panel held a hearing on the case Wednesday, but their comments and questions made it appear they would not side with Proposition 71 opponents.
David Llewellyn, a lawyer for the California Family Bioethics Council, argued that the proposition also violated a constitutional rule that ballot proposals have just one subject.
<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1979.html">California Embryonic Stem Cell Research Initiative Gets Appeal Hearing </a> (Steven Ertelt, lifenews.com)
Two consumer groups filed a lawsuit against the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine saying it does not have proper oversight from the state on spending its monies, as required by the state constitution.
It also contends the members of the committee were chosen on the basis of their affiliations with certain institutions, not on the basis of their personal qualifications.
The lawsuit resulted in a trial last year in the Alameda County Superior Court, where a judge upheld the proposition. The groups then appealed the case to the First Appellate District.
A three judge panel held a hearing on the case Wednesday, but their comments and questions made it appear they would not side with Proposition 71 opponents.
David Llewellyn, a lawyer for the California Family Bioethics Council, argued that the proposition also violated a constitutional rule that ballot proposals have just one subject.
<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1979.html">California Embryonic Stem Cell Research Initiative Gets Appeal Hearing </a> (Steven Ertelt, lifenews.com)
The future of stem cell research in California is now before the state Court of Appeals. As expected judges heard oral arguments that challenge stem cell legislation, passed by voters back in 2004. At stake $3 billion dollars in potential research.
To date, the state of California has loaned the stem cell research project some money to get going. But as long as this case stays in the courts, the $3 billion dollars will not be released. Today the case was discussed before the Court of Appeals -- it could go next to the State Supreme Court.
More than two years ago California voters decided to lead the nation in stem-cell research. Passage of Proposition 71 guaranteed $3 billion dollars for this project. Since then two groups have tried to stop it, claiming there is not enough government oversight.
Robert Taylor, People's Advocate and National Tax Limitation Foundation: "The ICOC has the sole authority to decide where the money is spent."
Not so says the chairman of the ICOC, which stands for Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, consisting of 29 mostly appointed members -- they are the regeants of the state's Stem Cell Institute.
Bob Klein, Chairman, ICOC: "The legislature audits all of our financials and we have to prepare independent audits of our financials, which are then looked at by the legislature and this independent committee headed by the treasurer."
The opposition also claims the selection process of what research gets funded is too broad.
<a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story?section=politics&id=5035403">Appeals Court To Decide Stem Cell Fate</a> (Lyanne Melendez, abclocal.go.com)
To date, the state of California has loaned the stem cell research project some money to get going. But as long as this case stays in the courts, the $3 billion dollars will not be released. Today the case was discussed before the Court of Appeals -- it could go next to the State Supreme Court.
More than two years ago California voters decided to lead the nation in stem-cell research. Passage of Proposition 71 guaranteed $3 billion dollars for this project. Since then two groups have tried to stop it, claiming there is not enough government oversight.
Robert Taylor, People's Advocate and National Tax Limitation Foundation: "The ICOC has the sole authority to decide where the money is spent."
Not so says the chairman of the ICOC, which stands for Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, consisting of 29 mostly appointed members -- they are the regeants of the state's Stem Cell Institute.
Bob Klein, Chairman, ICOC: "The legislature audits all of our financials and we have to prepare independent audits of our financials, which are then looked at by the legislature and this independent committee headed by the treasurer."
The opposition also claims the selection process of what research gets funded is too broad.
<a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story?section=politics&id=5035403">Appeals Court To Decide Stem Cell Fate</a> (Lyanne Melendez, abclocal.go.com)
A three-judge appellate court panel appeared skeptical that California's $3 billion stem cell agency was unconstitutional or that its managers had any conflicts of interest, as lawyers backed by anti-abortion groups and tax advocates argued Wednesday.
A lower court judge last year ruled in favor of the stem cell agency, which was created when Proposition 71 was passed by 59 percent of the electorate in 2004.
David Llewellyn, a lawyer representing the California Family Bioethics Council, argued Wednesday that the stem cell agency is rife with conflicts of interest.
He argued the officials from three university systems who sit on the board overseeing the agency could benefit because their various schools are applying for millions in research funds from the agency.
"First of all," a skeptical Justice Stuart Pollak said in response, "Proposition 71 does not permit members to vote on grants to their own institutions."
<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/16700053.htm">Appeals court hears $3 billion stem cell agency lawsuits</a> (PAUL ELIAS, mercurynews.com)
A lower court judge last year ruled in favor of the stem cell agency, which was created when Proposition 71 was passed by 59 percent of the electorate in 2004.
David Llewellyn, a lawyer representing the California Family Bioethics Council, argued Wednesday that the stem cell agency is rife with conflicts of interest.
He argued the officials from three university systems who sit on the board overseeing the agency could benefit because their various schools are applying for millions in research funds from the agency.
"First of all," a skeptical Justice Stuart Pollak said in response, "Proposition 71 does not permit members to vote on grants to their own institutions."
<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/16700053.htm">Appeals court hears $3 billion stem cell agency lawsuits</a> (PAUL ELIAS, mercurynews.com)
A bill allowing medical research in Iowa on stem cells obtained from cloned human embryos narrowly cleared the Senate this afternoon after a debate that veered between coolly technical science and passionate appeals on both sides.
Democrats, who pushed the legislation to passage on a slim 26-24 vote, billed it as a critical step toward research that could benefit thousands afflicted with chronic illnesses, including diabetes and Alzheimer’s. Stem cells, they contend, could hold the key to new treatments.
“This legislation is about making a clear choice,†said Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, the bill’s lead sponsor. “It is a clear choice between whether or not we are going to offer hope to thousands of Iowans who suffer with debilitating diseases and illness.â€
But opponents, mostly Republicans, warned that the bill would open the door to human cloning and its potentially dangerous consequences. They accused Democrats of seeking to mask that possibility in a cloud of “semantics and statistics.â€
“It’s the beginning of human cloning,†said Senate Minority Leader Mary Lundby, R-Marion. “This is the first step on a slippery slope.â€
<a href="http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2007/02/14/latest_news/doc45d36832e4025904435762.txt">Stem cell research bill clears Iowa Senate</a> (globegazette.com)
Democrats, who pushed the legislation to passage on a slim 26-24 vote, billed it as a critical step toward research that could benefit thousands afflicted with chronic illnesses, including diabetes and Alzheimer’s. Stem cells, they contend, could hold the key to new treatments.
“This legislation is about making a clear choice,†said Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, the bill’s lead sponsor. “It is a clear choice between whether or not we are going to offer hope to thousands of Iowans who suffer with debilitating diseases and illness.â€
But opponents, mostly Republicans, warned that the bill would open the door to human cloning and its potentially dangerous consequences. They accused Democrats of seeking to mask that possibility in a cloud of “semantics and statistics.â€
“It’s the beginning of human cloning,†said Senate Minority Leader Mary Lundby, R-Marion. “This is the first step on a slippery slope.â€
<a href="http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2007/02/14/latest_news/doc45d36832e4025904435762.txt">Stem cell research bill clears Iowa Senate</a> (globegazette.com)
The Senate has passed a bill that Democrats say would ease restrictions on embryonic stem cell research, and many Republicans say will open the door to human cloning.
The bill, approved on 26-24 vote, now goes to the House. Governor Chet Culver says it's now up to the 100 state representatives to decide is they want to give hope and opportunity to tens of thousands of people.
Democrats say current state law forbids therapeutic cloning to develop new stem cells. Many scientists say such cells hold new promise in therapies for many diseases including Alzheimer's disease and cancer.
<a href="http://www.kwwl.com/Global/story.asp?S=6088836&nav=2Ifu">Senate eases restrictions on embryonic stem cell research</a> (kwwl.com)
The bill, approved on 26-24 vote, now goes to the House. Governor Chet Culver says it's now up to the 100 state representatives to decide is they want to give hope and opportunity to tens of thousands of people.
Democrats say current state law forbids therapeutic cloning to develop new stem cells. Many scientists say such cells hold new promise in therapies for many diseases including Alzheimer's disease and cancer.
<a href="http://www.kwwl.com/Global/story.asp?S=6088836&nav=2Ifu">Senate eases restrictions on embryonic stem cell research</a> (kwwl.com)
In an interview with dLife founder Howard Steinberg, Pelosi says stem cell research supporters should "continue to create a drumbeat across America ……until the policy is changed."
The interview with Pelosi is available online and will be shown on a future episode of dLifeTV on CNBC (Sundays at 7:00pm ET). dLife is the only diabetes media and education network.
In the dLife interview, Pelosi says stem cell research "is not a partisan issue: Republicans and Democrats support embryonic stem cell research, just the president of the United States has not gotten to that place yet." But, she says, she, "has not given up on the president yet."
<a href="http://stemblog.net/?p=86">Create A Drumbeat Across America until the ESCR policy is changed</a> (stemblog.net)
The interview with Pelosi is available online and will be shown on a future episode of dLifeTV on CNBC (Sundays at 7:00pm ET). dLife is the only diabetes media and education network.
In the dLife interview, Pelosi says stem cell research "is not a partisan issue: Republicans and Democrats support embryonic stem cell research, just the president of the United States has not gotten to that place yet." But, she says, she, "has not given up on the president yet."
<a href="http://stemblog.net/?p=86">Create A Drumbeat Across America until the ESCR policy is changed</a> (stemblog.net)
Legislative proposals to gut the major goal of an amendment protecting stem cell research are off to a slow start.
Voters in November narrowly approved a constitutional change guaranteeing that any research permitted by federal law can occur in Missouri. The chief point for supporters was heading off legislative attempts to prevent a certain form of embryonic stem cell research from taking place.
Anti-abortion activists say the research method ends life at its earliest stages. Rep. Jim Lembke, R-St. Louis, has proposed another constitutional change that strikes at the heart of the new constitutional language, though it does not repeal it directly.
The House Health Care Policy Committee heard the bill last week and could have voted Tuesday on whether to send it to the full House for debate. But the chairman didn't even bring up the bill at the meeting. He said he's not seeking a vote because there's not enough support yet.
<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/344D8A14F92748EC86257282000A7DB5?OpenDocument">Stem cell opposition bills bog down</a> (stltoday.com)
Voters in November narrowly approved a constitutional change guaranteeing that any research permitted by federal law can occur in Missouri. The chief point for supporters was heading off legislative attempts to prevent a certain form of embryonic stem cell research from taking place.
Anti-abortion activists say the research method ends life at its earliest stages. Rep. Jim Lembke, R-St. Louis, has proposed another constitutional change that strikes at the heart of the new constitutional language, though it does not repeal it directly.
The House Health Care Policy Committee heard the bill last week and could have voted Tuesday on whether to send it to the full House for debate. But the chairman didn't even bring up the bill at the meeting. He said he's not seeking a vote because there's not enough support yet.
<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/344D8A14F92748EC86257282000A7DB5?OpenDocument">Stem cell opposition bills bog down</a> (stltoday.com)
The General Assembly is about to re-enter the national debate over stem cell research, but without the controversy that dogged the issue in the legislature last year.
Sen. David Shafer, R-Duluth, introduced a bill on Tuesday to encourage “non-destructive’’ stem cell research in Georgia by setting up a way for women to donate postnatal tissues and fluids.
Umbilical cord blood, placental tissue and amniotic fluids are rich in what are known as “adult’’ stem cells, which can be used to look for causes, treatments and cures of various diseases.
Shafer’s bill would be limited to adult stem cells and, thus, would not include stem cells taken from embryos discarded by fertility clinics, a process that destroys the embryo.
Advocates of stem cell research, from Hollywood celebrities to former first lady Nancy Reagan, say embryonic stem cells hold more potential than the adult variety.
Congress passed legislation last year to expand embryonic stem cell research, but President Bush vetoed the bill.
This year, with Democrats running Congress, the House already has passed an identical bill. The Senate is expected to follow suit.
But on Tuesday, Shafer said researchers at Wake Forest University in North Carolina recently found a way to extract adult stem cells that have all of the advantages of embryonic cells.
“These stem cells are as potent as embryonic stem cells, easier to control in the lab and do not as easily mutate into cancers,’’ he said. “The cutting edge of science has shifted to prenatal amniotic stem cells.’’
<a href="http://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/index.php?s=&url_channel_id=32&url_article_id=24761&url_subchannel_id=&change_well_id=2">Lawmakers to resume stem cell debate </a> (Dave Williams, gwinnettdailypost.com)
Sen. David Shafer, R-Duluth, introduced a bill on Tuesday to encourage “non-destructive’’ stem cell research in Georgia by setting up a way for women to donate postnatal tissues and fluids.
Umbilical cord blood, placental tissue and amniotic fluids are rich in what are known as “adult’’ stem cells, which can be used to look for causes, treatments and cures of various diseases.
Shafer’s bill would be limited to adult stem cells and, thus, would not include stem cells taken from embryos discarded by fertility clinics, a process that destroys the embryo.
Advocates of stem cell research, from Hollywood celebrities to former first lady Nancy Reagan, say embryonic stem cells hold more potential than the adult variety.
Congress passed legislation last year to expand embryonic stem cell research, but President Bush vetoed the bill.
This year, with Democrats running Congress, the House already has passed an identical bill. The Senate is expected to follow suit.
But on Tuesday, Shafer said researchers at Wake Forest University in North Carolina recently found a way to extract adult stem cells that have all of the advantages of embryonic cells.
“These stem cells are as potent as embryonic stem cells, easier to control in the lab and do not as easily mutate into cancers,’’ he said. “The cutting edge of science has shifted to prenatal amniotic stem cells.’’
<a href="http://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/index.php?s=&url_channel_id=32&url_article_id=24761&url_subchannel_id=&change_well_id=2">Lawmakers to resume stem cell debate </a> (Dave Williams, gwinnettdailypost.com)
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is telling Americans to contact President Bush to urge Bush to change position on stem cell research.
In an interview with dLife founder Howard Steinberg, Pelosi says stem cell research supporters should "continue to create a drumbeat across America ... even if their member in Congress is okay on this issue ...until the policy is changed."
The interview with Pelosi is available online and will be shown on a future episode of dLifeTV on CNBC (Sundays at 7:00pm ET). dLife is the only diabetes media and education network.
<a href="http://onthehillblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/pelosi-urges-americans-to-lobby-bush-on.html">Pelosi Urges Americans To Lobby Bush on Stem Cells </a> (onthehillblog.blogspot.com)
In an interview with dLife founder Howard Steinberg, Pelosi says stem cell research supporters should "continue to create a drumbeat across America ... even if their member in Congress is okay on this issue ...until the policy is changed."
The interview with Pelosi is available online and will be shown on a future episode of dLifeTV on CNBC (Sundays at 7:00pm ET). dLife is the only diabetes media and education network.
<a href="http://onthehillblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/pelosi-urges-americans-to-lobby-bush-on.html">Pelosi Urges Americans To Lobby Bush on Stem Cells </a> (onthehillblog.blogspot.com)
The Legislature is moving aggressively to ease re-strictions on embryonic stem cell research that backers say could help scien-tists find cures for diseases such as Parkinson's and diabetes.
A measure to ease the restrictions was cleared by a Senate committee on Mon-day, and could go to the full Senate later this week, supporters said.
``This legislation also allows Iowa researchers to join those in other states who are fighting to improve and save lives by engaging in stem cell research,'' said Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, among the measure's main supporters.
Gov. Chet Culver said he would consider approving such a bill. However, the measure faces opposition from lawmakers who say human embryos are created only to be destroyed and that any expansion of stem cell research would prompt some unwanted changes.
``We're talking about lifting the ban on human cloning,'' said Sen. Jerry Behn, R-Boone.
<a href="http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070213/NEWS01/70213003/1079">Lawmakers move to ease restrictions on stem cell research</a> (press-citizen.com)
A measure to ease the restrictions was cleared by a Senate committee on Mon-day, and could go to the full Senate later this week, supporters said.
``This legislation also allows Iowa researchers to join those in other states who are fighting to improve and save lives by engaging in stem cell research,'' said Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, among the measure's main supporters.
Gov. Chet Culver said he would consider approving such a bill. However, the measure faces opposition from lawmakers who say human embryos are created only to be destroyed and that any expansion of stem cell research would prompt some unwanted changes.
``We're talking about lifting the ban on human cloning,'' said Sen. Jerry Behn, R-Boone.
<a href="http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070213/NEWS01/70213003/1079">Lawmakers move to ease restrictions on stem cell research</a> (press-citizen.com)
While hosting officials from the United Kingdom at the state Capitol Monday, Gov. Jim Doyle announced University of Wisconsin-affiliated laboratories would team up with its U.K. counterparts on embryonic stem-cell research.
WiCell, a subsidiary of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Facility and home of the National Stem Cell Bank, will begin collaborative research with the U.K. Stem Cell Bank and the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Doyle said.
“Discoveries that have been made here have led to research that has been conducted throughout the world,†Doyle said at Monday’s press conference. “[The UK has] moved forward in embryonic research, and we hope the U.S. will follow the lead and embrace this incredibly important research that holds such great promise for the areas of illness long thought to be incurable.â€
Doyle added he hopes Wisconsin can capture 10 percent of the national stem-cell market by 2015.
<a href="http://badgerherald.com/news/2007/02/13/london_calling_uw_st.php">London calling UW stem cells</a> (Nick Penzenstadler, badgerherald.com)
WiCell, a subsidiary of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Facility and home of the National Stem Cell Bank, will begin collaborative research with the U.K. Stem Cell Bank and the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Doyle said.
“Discoveries that have been made here have led to research that has been conducted throughout the world,†Doyle said at Monday’s press conference. “[The UK has] moved forward in embryonic research, and we hope the U.S. will follow the lead and embrace this incredibly important research that holds such great promise for the areas of illness long thought to be incurable.â€
Doyle added he hopes Wisconsin can capture 10 percent of the national stem-cell market by 2015.
<a href="http://badgerherald.com/news/2007/02/13/london_calling_uw_st.php">London calling UW stem cells</a> (Nick Penzenstadler, badgerherald.com)
In her gloved hand, researcher Nayani Pramanik holds one of the latest breakthroughs in Maine's fledgling world of human stem cell work.
A stem-cell-derived gene that limits the production of red blood cells courses through the liquid she drips into a test tube.
It's a gene that scientists at the Maine Medical Center Research Institute have learned how to inhibit in anemic patients, whose low reserves of red blood cells cause fatigue, and in the worst cases, fatal organ damage.
And, scientists say, it is another solid argument for why funding must keep flowing to human stem cell research in Maine.
"It would be terrific timing to sturdy up what is on solid legs, but short ones because we're only a few years into the program," said Don Wojchowski, director of the Stem Cell and Progenitor Cell Biology program created in 2003.
A couple of state legislators are offering a potentially major boost to Maine's biomedical community with proposals that would set aside up to $20 million for research using human stem cells.
State money could bridge the funding gap that scientists say occurs when federal grants run out and applications for new grants are pending. It's a wait made all the more nerve-wracking by increasingly fierce competition for grants related to federal budget cutbacks.
Travis Roy, a Yarmouth native who in 1995 suffered a spinal cord injury while playing in his first hockey game for Boston University, said the more funding sources, the better.
<a href="http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/070213stemcell.html">Bill backs stem cell research</a> (JOSIE HUANG, pressherald.mainetoday.com)
A stem-cell-derived gene that limits the production of red blood cells courses through the liquid she drips into a test tube.
It's a gene that scientists at the Maine Medical Center Research Institute have learned how to inhibit in anemic patients, whose low reserves of red blood cells cause fatigue, and in the worst cases, fatal organ damage.
And, scientists say, it is another solid argument for why funding must keep flowing to human stem cell research in Maine.
"It would be terrific timing to sturdy up what is on solid legs, but short ones because we're only a few years into the program," said Don Wojchowski, director of the Stem Cell and Progenitor Cell Biology program created in 2003.
A couple of state legislators are offering a potentially major boost to Maine's biomedical community with proposals that would set aside up to $20 million for research using human stem cells.
State money could bridge the funding gap that scientists say occurs when federal grants run out and applications for new grants are pending. It's a wait made all the more nerve-wracking by increasingly fierce competition for grants related to federal budget cutbacks.
Travis Roy, a Yarmouth native who in 1995 suffered a spinal cord injury while playing in his first hockey game for Boston University, said the more funding sources, the better.
<a href="http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/070213stemcell.html">Bill backs stem cell research</a> (JOSIE HUANG, pressherald.mainetoday.com)
The battle over stem cell research gets underway today at the statehouse when senators begin pouring over proposed legislation dealing with the issue. Governor Chet Culver has called on lawmakers to repeal a ban on a type of cloning that he says restricts stem cell research.
Senate Democratic Leader Mike Gronstal of Council Bluffs says Democrats are ready to act. "We're looking to rewrite that section of law," Gronstal says. "We are going to continue to keep the ban on human cloning in place so this bill will not allow human cloning but it will allow research and it will allow the treatment that have diseases like Parkinson's or diabetes or spinal chord injuries."
<a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=B719617E-ADD5-B709-045F5442129C799F">Stem cell research focus of discussion at Statehouse</a> ( O.Kay Henderson, radioiowa.com)
Senate Democratic Leader Mike Gronstal of Council Bluffs says Democrats are ready to act. "We're looking to rewrite that section of law," Gronstal says. "We are going to continue to keep the ban on human cloning in place so this bill will not allow human cloning but it will allow research and it will allow the treatment that have diseases like Parkinson's or diabetes or spinal chord injuries."
<a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=B719617E-ADD5-B709-045F5442129C799F">Stem cell research focus of discussion at Statehouse</a> ( O.Kay Henderson, radioiowa.com)
Hunched over a microscope in a cramped, windowless laboratory at the University of Minnesota's Stem Cell Institute, researcher Lucas Chase peers at a sight that brings the promise and controversy over embryonic stem cell research into laser-sharp focus.
"There, look at that!" Chase exclaimed. In a 3-inch petri dish crowded with more than a million embryonic cells, one cell pulses like a warning light. Plucked from the impossibly small inner cell mass of a 5-day-old embryo, coddled in a "nutrient cocktail," it is evolving into heart tissue and already vibrates with a rudimentary beat.
Minnesota is headed for a political collision over research like Chase's. A DFL bill at the Legislature would endorse embryonic stem cell research and allow state funding, as a handful of other states have already done.
That bill cleared its first Capitol hurdle last week, but also drew a warning from Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who said he opposes "wide-open" embryonic stem cell research and is likely to veto any legislation without specific restrictions.
<a href="http://www.startribune.com/587/story/995774.html">Will Minnesota fund stem cell research?</a> (Patricia Lopez, startribune.com)
"There, look at that!" Chase exclaimed. In a 3-inch petri dish crowded with more than a million embryonic cells, one cell pulses like a warning light. Plucked from the impossibly small inner cell mass of a 5-day-old embryo, coddled in a "nutrient cocktail," it is evolving into heart tissue and already vibrates with a rudimentary beat.
Minnesota is headed for a political collision over research like Chase's. A DFL bill at the Legislature would endorse embryonic stem cell research and allow state funding, as a handful of other states have already done.
That bill cleared its first Capitol hurdle last week, but also drew a warning from Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who said he opposes "wide-open" embryonic stem cell research and is likely to veto any legislation without specific restrictions.
<a href="http://www.startribune.com/587/story/995774.html">Will Minnesota fund stem cell research?</a> (Patricia Lopez, startribune.com)
The Boston Globe ran an article this weekend taking the position that Mitt Romney's views on embryonic stem cell research may not be conservative enough for many in the right wing (here). Key graph:
Unlike many on the right, Romney supports research on excess embryos created during fertility treatments. Because couples are making embryos to have a baby, he reasons, it is ethical to use the leftovers for research when they would otherwise just be discarded.
Hugh Hewitt responds to what he deems an anti-romney campaign by the Globe, charging negligence to note that both Rudy and McCain stand to the left of Romney on ebyronic stem cell research/funding. Hugh's lengthy post can be found here. Key graph:
This is a deep flaw that the Globe is either unaware of or indifferent to, as are most in the MSM. The campaigns among the Republicans and the Democrats are about the choice voters will have to make among serious candidates. Interesting MSM reporting --and the sort of reporting that will attract as opposed to repell readers-- will cover the campaign with the wide lens at all times. "Analysis" will not get jumbled up with reporting. And the reporting won't include nonsense like "big swing to the right" simply because it fits the agenda of the paper, the editor, or the reporter.
<a href="http://www.romneyreport.com/archives/2007/02/boston_globe_he.html">Boston Globe & Hewitt on Romney Embryonic Stem Cell Position</a> (romneyreport.com)
Unlike many on the right, Romney supports research on excess embryos created during fertility treatments. Because couples are making embryos to have a baby, he reasons, it is ethical to use the leftovers for research when they would otherwise just be discarded.
Hugh Hewitt responds to what he deems an anti-romney campaign by the Globe, charging negligence to note that both Rudy and McCain stand to the left of Romney on ebyronic stem cell research/funding. Hugh's lengthy post can be found here. Key graph:
This is a deep flaw that the Globe is either unaware of or indifferent to, as are most in the MSM. The campaigns among the Republicans and the Democrats are about the choice voters will have to make among serious candidates. Interesting MSM reporting --and the sort of reporting that will attract as opposed to repell readers-- will cover the campaign with the wide lens at all times. "Analysis" will not get jumbled up with reporting. And the reporting won't include nonsense like "big swing to the right" simply because it fits the agenda of the paper, the editor, or the reporter.
<a href="http://www.romneyreport.com/archives/2007/02/boston_globe_he.html">Boston Globe & Hewitt on Romney Embryonic Stem Cell Position</a> (romneyreport.com)
MU researchers are closely watching the debate in Jefferson City over efforts to restrict embryonic stem cell research on the campus.
Amendments to a major higher education bill in the Missouri Senate would cut funding for new buildings in which stem cell research could be conducted, while a House joint resolution proposed by Rep. Jim Lembke, R-St. Louis County, looks to ban all forms of human cloning in Missouri. The resolution is aimed at somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), which occurs when the nucleus of a somatic cell is inserted into an egg cell that has had its nucleus removed. The cell divides numerous times and eventually forms a blastocyst, an early-stage embryo with near identical DNA to the original organism.
The resolution is necessary, supporters say, because Amendment 2, approved by voters in November, does not specifically ban all forms of human cloning and opens loopholes for researchers.
“This reminds me of an issue a few years ago involving carrying firearms and concealed weapons,†said R. Michael Roberts, curator’s professor of animal science and biochemistry. “The state voted against it in a ballot initiative so that it would be banned. Then the legislature turned around and reversed it. That was an indication to me that sometimes the legislature is not willing to allow the democratic process to proceed, and what’s going on now may be another of those cases.â€
<a href="http://columbiamissourian.com/utown/story.php?ID=24178">Stem cell restrictions considered</a> (columbiamissourian.com)
Amendments to a major higher education bill in the Missouri Senate would cut funding for new buildings in which stem cell research could be conducted, while a House joint resolution proposed by Rep. Jim Lembke, R-St. Louis County, looks to ban all forms of human cloning in Missouri. The resolution is aimed at somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), which occurs when the nucleus of a somatic cell is inserted into an egg cell that has had its nucleus removed. The cell divides numerous times and eventually forms a blastocyst, an early-stage embryo with near identical DNA to the original organism.
The resolution is necessary, supporters say, because Amendment 2, approved by voters in November, does not specifically ban all forms of human cloning and opens loopholes for researchers.
“This reminds me of an issue a few years ago involving carrying firearms and concealed weapons,†said R. Michael Roberts, curator’s professor of animal science and biochemistry. “The state voted against it in a ballot initiative so that it would be banned. Then the legislature turned around and reversed it. That was an indication to me that sometimes the legislature is not willing to allow the democratic process to proceed, and what’s going on now may be another of those cases.â€
<a href="http://columbiamissourian.com/utown/story.php?ID=24178">Stem cell restrictions considered</a> (columbiamissourian.com)
The Iowa General Assembly will begin debate this week on a measure that would ease restrictions on embryonic stem cell research and a North Iowa Democrat will be at the center of the action.
Sen. Amanda Ragan, D-Mason City, chairs the Senate Human Resources Committee, the panel that will debate the bill as soon as Monday.
“I believe that it has great potential,†Ragan said late last week about the opportunity to improve treatment for diseases using stem cell research.
Social conservatives say the proposal would essentially repeal the state’s ban on human cloning, because embryonic stem cell research involves the creation of human embryos.
Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, said the talk about human cloning is a distraction from the real issue, which is the need for research into treatments for Parkinson’s disease and other illnesses.
“We are going to continue to keep the ban on human cloning in place,†he said.
Researchers from the University of Iowa have complained that the state’s current law is one of the most restrictive in the country.
“This will enable us to do the research we haven’t been able to do over the last few years,†Ragan said.
<a href="http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2007/02/11/latest_news/doc45ceb9e1701e1869044100.txt">Stem cell debate could begin Monday</a> (Dan Gearino, globegazette.com)
Sen. Amanda Ragan, D-Mason City, chairs the Senate Human Resources Committee, the panel that will debate the bill as soon as Monday.
“I believe that it has great potential,†Ragan said late last week about the opportunity to improve treatment for diseases using stem cell research.
Social conservatives say the proposal would essentially repeal the state’s ban on human cloning, because embryonic stem cell research involves the creation of human embryos.
Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, said the talk about human cloning is a distraction from the real issue, which is the need for research into treatments for Parkinson’s disease and other illnesses.
“We are going to continue to keep the ban on human cloning in place,†he said.
Researchers from the University of Iowa have complained that the state’s current law is one of the most restrictive in the country.
“This will enable us to do the research we haven’t been able to do over the last few years,†Ragan said.
<a href="http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2007/02/11/latest_news/doc45ceb9e1701e1869044100.txt">Stem cell debate could begin Monday</a> (Dan Gearino, globegazette.com)
Unlike many on the right, Romney supports research on excess embryos created during fertility treatments. Because couples are making embryos to have a baby, he reasons, it is ethical to use the leftovers for research when they would otherwise just be discarded.
Romney's position, however, is at odds with the views of many conservative anti abortion activists, who believe that any work on stem cells derived from human embryos is wrong, because it destroys the embryos in the process. Some say Romney's views make him unacceptable to many voters and will complicate his attempt to win the 2008 GOP nomination by appealing to the party's conservative flank.
Romney's views on stem cell research, which have drawn little public scrutiny amid the static over his shifts on abortion and gay rights, are sure to attract more attention with Congress poised to pass a bill expanding federal support for human embryonic stem cell research, the latest flashpoint in a long-running debate about the sanctity of life and when it begins.
<a href="http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2007/02/create_a_market_for_human_bein.html">CREATE A MARKET FOR HUMAN BEINGS AND SOMEONE WILL HARVEST THEM FOR YOU:</a> (brothersjuddblog.com)
Romney's position, however, is at odds with the views of many conservative anti abortion activists, who believe that any work on stem cells derived from human embryos is wrong, because it destroys the embryos in the process. Some say Romney's views make him unacceptable to many voters and will complicate his attempt to win the 2008 GOP nomination by appealing to the party's conservative flank.
Romney's views on stem cell research, which have drawn little public scrutiny amid the static over his shifts on abortion and gay rights, are sure to attract more attention with Congress poised to pass a bill expanding federal support for human embryonic stem cell research, the latest flashpoint in a long-running debate about the sanctity of life and when it begins.
<a href="http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2007/02/create_a_market_for_human_bein.html">CREATE A MARKET FOR HUMAN BEINGS AND SOMEONE WILL HARVEST THEM FOR YOU:</a> (brothersjuddblog.com)
In the heated debate among conservatives over whether Mitt Romney deserves their vote, the focus has been largely on whether his big swings to the right on social issues are sincere.
But on the charged issue of stem cell research, he's facing conservative criticism of a different shade: that he hasn't swung far enough.
Unlike many on the right, Romney supports research on excess embryos created during fertility treatments. Because couples are making embryos to have a baby, he reasons, it is ethical to use the leftovers for research when they would otherwise just be discarded.
Romney's position, however, is at odds with the views of many conservative anti abortion activists, who believe that any work on stem cells derived from human embryos is wrong, because it destroys the embryos in the process. Some say Romney's views make him unacceptable to many voters and will complicate his attempt to win the 2008 GOP nomination by appealing to the party's conservative flank.
<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/">Romney's stem cell view may upset the right</a> (Scott Helman, boston.com)
But on the charged issue of stem cell research, he's facing conservative criticism of a different shade: that he hasn't swung far enough.
Unlike many on the right, Romney supports research on excess embryos created during fertility treatments. Because couples are making embryos to have a baby, he reasons, it is ethical to use the leftovers for research when they would otherwise just be discarded.
Romney's position, however, is at odds with the views of many conservative anti abortion activists, who believe that any work on stem cells derived from human embryos is wrong, because it destroys the embryos in the process. Some say Romney's views make him unacceptable to many voters and will complicate his attempt to win the 2008 GOP nomination by appealing to the party's conservative flank.
<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/02/11/romneys_stem_cell_view_may_upset_the_right/">Romney's stem cell view may upset the right</a> (Scott Helman, boston.com)
A scientist’s interest in heart research likely translates into curiosity in stem cell research, Mark Anderson said.
“Anyone who is interested in learning about heart disease is going to be interested in stem cells and the possibility they hold for patients,†Anderson said.
Technically an electro-physiologist who studies abnormal heart rhythms, Anderson is the head of cardiology at the University of Iowa. He is a physician, a scholar and a scientist. He also is a key player in Gov. Chet Culver’s plan for a $12.5 million grant toward a UI stem cell research center.
Culver has called on legislators to lift bans on researching some strains of embryonic stem cells â€" a controversial and often politicized topic â€" and invest in research to make Iowa more attractive to top researchers and biotech companies.
“I was really excited to see that we have a governor who seems to be an advocate for the university and who sees what a gem we have right here,†Anderson said. “He came here and I said I would work hard to promote this part of his agenda.â€
In his work, Anderson blends a passion for scientific research with a desire to provide individual patient care.
<a href="http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070210/NEWS01/70210005/1079">Cardiologist leads stem cell research crusade</a> (Brian Morelli, press-citizen.com)
“Anyone who is interested in learning about heart disease is going to be interested in stem cells and the possibility they hold for patients,†Anderson said.
Technically an electro-physiologist who studies abnormal heart rhythms, Anderson is the head of cardiology at the University of Iowa. He is a physician, a scholar and a scientist. He also is a key player in Gov. Chet Culver’s plan for a $12.5 million grant toward a UI stem cell research center.
Culver has called on legislators to lift bans on researching some strains of embryonic stem cells â€" a controversial and often politicized topic â€" and invest in research to make Iowa more attractive to top researchers and biotech companies.
“I was really excited to see that we have a governor who seems to be an advocate for the university and who sees what a gem we have right here,†Anderson said. “He came here and I said I would work hard to promote this part of his agenda.â€
In his work, Anderson blends a passion for scientific research with a desire to provide individual patient care.
<a href="http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070210/NEWS01/70210005/1079">Cardiologist leads stem cell research crusade</a> (Brian Morelli, press-citizen.com)
Sen. Dave Mulder, R-Sioux Center, said his e-mail box started filling up Tuesday.
And that's how he knew that a long-awaited bill repealing Iowa's ban on some forms of embryonic stem cell research had finally arrived in the Senate.
"Not one favors it yet," Mulder said of his rapidly filling inbox.
The Democratic-backed bill would carve out an exception in Iowa's ban on human cloning to allow the use of cloning techniques to create embryos for research. Backers insist stem cells harvested from those embryos could hold the key to cures for a long list of chronic illnesses.
Supporters argue Iowa's ban is driving off promising and lucrative research. Gov. Chet Culver wants the ban repealed and $12.5 million to build a stem cell research center at the University of Iowa.
Mulder's constituents and other opponents of the bill contend it amounts to a weakening of Iowa's broader ban on the cloning of humans. Some critics are morally opposed to what they dub "clone and kill" research techniques.
<a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/02/08/news/legislature/2b0e6100dbee7e248625727c00134635.txt">Inbox fills up on stem-cell research </a> (siouxcityjournal.com)
And that's how he knew that a long-awaited bill repealing Iowa's ban on some forms of embryonic stem cell research had finally arrived in the Senate.
"Not one favors it yet," Mulder said of his rapidly filling inbox.
The Democratic-backed bill would carve out an exception in Iowa's ban on human cloning to allow the use of cloning techniques to create embryos for research. Backers insist stem cells harvested from those embryos could hold the key to cures for a long list of chronic illnesses.
Supporters argue Iowa's ban is driving off promising and lucrative research. Gov. Chet Culver wants the ban repealed and $12.5 million to build a stem cell research center at the University of Iowa.
Mulder's constituents and other opponents of the bill contend it amounts to a weakening of Iowa's broader ban on the cloning of humans. Some critics are morally opposed to what they dub "clone and kill" research techniques.
<a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/02/08/news/legislature/2b0e6100dbee7e248625727c00134635.txt">Inbox fills up on stem-cell research </a> (siouxcityjournal.com)
The issue of whether the state of Iowa should allow stem cell research was at the forefront of political debate in the 2006 elections. With the political rhetoric behind us, it's time for a more factual discussion on this important topic.
In his address to the Legislature last week, Gov. Chet Culver called for spending $12.5 million on stem cell research at the University of Iowa. He also called for the Iowa Legislature to remove Iowa's ban on stem cell research.
The governor's request to remove the ban will require no action from the Iowa Legislature, because both adult and embryonic stem cell research are already allowed in Iowa for research purposes.
<a href="http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070209/NEWS09/702090309/1001/NEWS">Boal: Time for close look at stem cell research </a> (CARMINE BOAL, desmoinesregister.com)
In his address to the Legislature last week, Gov. Chet Culver called for spending $12.5 million on stem cell research at the University of Iowa. He also called for the Iowa Legislature to remove Iowa's ban on stem cell research.
The governor's request to remove the ban will require no action from the Iowa Legislature, because both adult and embryonic stem cell research are already allowed in Iowa for research purposes.
<a href="http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070209/NEWS09/702090309/1001/NEWS">Boal: Time for close look at stem cell research </a> (CARMINE BOAL, desmoinesregister.com)
State Sen. Chuck Graham says he will work to get two University of Missouri-Columbia building projects back into a higher education bill after they were eliminated in a flap over embryonic stem cell research.
"The projects at the University of Missouri were the most crucial on the list and designed to be the engine of Missouri’s economy for the long-term future," Graham said after a Senate committee eliminated six building projects.
The dispute about stem cell research played a major role in the projects’ defeat.
Three Republican senators who believe stem cell research might include human cloning joined with four Democratic senators who wanted no restrictions on research that would be conducted in the new buildings. Combined, their seven votes defeated the full package of projects as they were considered yesterday in the Senate Education Committee.
After the bill with all projects lost, Sen. Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, offered a substitute bill that eliminated the six projects where it might be possible to conduct life science research, including the Columbia buildings. Cut from the package were $85 million for a Health Sciences Research and Education Center and $2 million for a business incubator.
<a href="http://www.columbiatribune.com/2007/Feb/20070208News003.asp">Stem cell dispute stings MU </a> (columbiatribune.com)
"The projects at the University of Missouri were the most crucial on the list and designed to be the engine of Missouri’s economy for the long-term future," Graham said after a Senate committee eliminated six building projects.
The dispute about stem cell research played a major role in the projects’ defeat.
Three Republican senators who believe stem cell research might include human cloning joined with four Democratic senators who wanted no restrictions on research that would be conducted in the new buildings. Combined, their seven votes defeated the full package of projects as they were considered yesterday in the Senate Education Committee.
After the bill with all projects lost, Sen. Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, offered a substitute bill that eliminated the six projects where it might be possible to conduct life science research, including the Columbia buildings. Cut from the package were $85 million for a Health Sciences Research and Education Center and $2 million for a business incubator.
<a href="http://www.columbiatribune.com/2007/Feb/20070208News003.asp">Stem cell dispute stings MU </a> (columbiatribune.com)
Missouri lawmakers cut $113 million in university building projects from a $335 million higher education bill Wednesday, as The St. Louis Post Dispatch reported. Their reason? As the Post-Dispatch puts it, “The committee chairman, Sen. Gary Nodler, R-Joplin, said the projects that had been cut had been identified as possibly housing stem cell research in the future.â€
Given the toxic political atmosphere surrounding embryonic stem cell research, which many scientists herald but abortion opponents scorn, one might expect that administrators would be jumping for joy in Minnesota, where a House committee met Wednesday to debate a bill explicitly affirming the ability of the University of Minnesota to spend state-appropriated funds on stem cell research. After all, their university is a stem cell research center, home to the Stem Cell Institute, which was founded in 1999 as the world’s first interdisciplinary institute dedicated to the field. Yet, administrators’ lukewarm, “no official position†response perhaps reflects a larger trend for many public universities to insulate themselves, as much as possible, from the political debate.
<a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/02/09/minnesota">Stem Cell Silence</a> (insidehighered.com)
Given the toxic political atmosphere surrounding embryonic stem cell research, which many scientists herald but abortion opponents scorn, one might expect that administrators would be jumping for joy in Minnesota, where a House committee met Wednesday to debate a bill explicitly affirming the ability of the University of Minnesota to spend state-appropriated funds on stem cell research. After all, their university is a stem cell research center, home to the Stem Cell Institute, which was founded in 1999 as the world’s first interdisciplinary institute dedicated to the field. Yet, administrators’ lukewarm, “no official position†response perhaps reflects a larger trend for many public universities to insulate themselves, as much as possible, from the political debate.
<a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/02/09/minnesota">Stem Cell Silence</a> (insidehighered.com)
The latest plan to use millions of dollars in student loan sale assets to fund new buildings on public university campuses has left the starting blocks without Columbia.
The package of campus construction projects now en route to the floor of the state Senate does not include $85 million for a new Health Sciences Research and Education Center and $2 million for a business incubator. Both projects were on the University of Missouri-Columbia’s drawing board
Those two projects were among six that died yesterday during a complicated political dispute involving embryonic stem cell research and other issues. Proponents of all six projects promise to get them restored when the funding package comes up for full Senate debate.
But other problems are beginning to loom on the horizon for the comprehensive higher education package that has faced troubles ever since Gov. Matt Blunt proposed it more than a year ago. The latest wrinkle is being raised by 13 former University of Missouri curators who believe the bill that includes money for the new college buildings also steals power from the existing Board of Curators, which is established in the Missouri Constitution to govern the university.
<a href="http://www.columbiatribune.com/2007/Feb/20070208News052.asp">Research constraints, stem cells gum up student loan sale </a> (TERRY GANEY, columbiatribune.com)
The package of campus construction projects now en route to the floor of the state Senate does not include $85 million for a new Health Sciences Research and Education Center and $2 million for a business incubator. Both projects were on the University of Missouri-Columbia’s drawing board
Those two projects were among six that died yesterday during a complicated political dispute involving embryonic stem cell research and other issues. Proponents of all six projects promise to get them restored when the funding package comes up for full Senate debate.
But other problems are beginning to loom on the horizon for the comprehensive higher education package that has faced troubles ever since Gov. Matt Blunt proposed it more than a year ago. The latest wrinkle is being raised by 13 former University of Missouri curators who believe the bill that includes money for the new college buildings also steals power from the existing Board of Curators, which is established in the Missouri Constitution to govern the university.
<a href="http://www.columbiatribune.com/2007/Feb/20070208News052.asp">Research constraints, stem cells gum up student loan sale </a> (TERRY GANEY, columbiatribune.com)
President George Bush vetoed a bill that would have allowed surplus embryos from fertility clinics to be used in research. This decision will cause slowing of cures for several major diseases including cancer.
If politicians say they support stem cell research then it doesn't necessarily mean that they support embryonic stem cell research which is the one that holds the greatest promise for the most diseases.
It was five years ago that President Bush 'allowed' research on the 60 existing stem cell lines. It didn't sway his decision however that we now know that these lines are not going to help us with human diseases.
Stem cell research has another setback (topcancernews.com)
If politicians say they support stem cell research then it doesn't necessarily mean that they support embryonic stem cell research which is the one that holds the greatest promise for the most diseases.
It was five years ago that President Bush 'allowed' research on the 60 existing stem cell lines. It didn't sway his decision however that we now know that these lines are not going to help us with human diseases.
Stem cell research has another setback (topcancernews.com)
A Minnesota House committee heard a bill Wednesday that would establish policy for state-funded embryonic stem cell research.
The bill, introduced by campus-area DFL Rep. Phyllis Kahn, became instantly controversial as lawmakers and testifiers raised scientific and ethical questions about research involving human embryos.
After a heated debate that led the House Biosciences and Emerging Technology Committee to close 30 minutes late, lawmakers sent the bill to the Higher Education and Workforce Development Policy and Finance Division Committee without a vote.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty said he wouldn't support any bill to fund research that involves the destruction of a human embryo.
University assistant professor Meri Firpo, who conducts diabetes research using embryonic stem cells, said she doesn't understand the governor's perspective on the issue.
"It's not clear to me the scientific basis of what he's saying," Firpo said. Scientists don't know for sure if cells can be extracted from embryos without damaging them, she said.
Firpo said part of the controversy might have to do with the common misconception about embryonic stem cell research.
"People get fetal research and embryonic research confused all the time," Firpo said.
<a href="http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2007/02/08/70670">Stem cell bill under debate</a> (Courtney Blanchard, mndaily.com)
The bill, introduced by campus-area DFL Rep. Phyllis Kahn, became instantly controversial as lawmakers and testifiers raised scientific and ethical questions about research involving human embryos.
After a heated debate that led the House Biosciences and Emerging Technology Committee to close 30 minutes late, lawmakers sent the bill to the Higher Education and Workforce Development Policy and Finance Division Committee without a vote.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty said he wouldn't support any bill to fund research that involves the destruction of a human embryo.
University assistant professor Meri Firpo, who conducts diabetes research using embryonic stem cells, said she doesn't understand the governor's perspective on the issue.
"It's not clear to me the scientific basis of what he's saying," Firpo said. Scientists don't know for sure if cells can be extracted from embryos without damaging them, she said.
Firpo said part of the controversy might have to do with the common misconception about embryonic stem cell research.
"People get fetal research and embryonic research confused all the time," Firpo said.
<a href="http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2007/02/08/70670">Stem cell bill under debate</a> (Courtney Blanchard, mndaily.com)
The bitter fight over embryonic stem cell research in Missouri led to six university building projects being axed Wednesday from a higher education bill by the Senate Education Committee.
The 6-4 vote in Jefferson City was along party lines, with Republicans in favor of the bill that now moves to the Senate floor. The diminished project list is a blow to Gov. Matt Blunt, who had trumpeted the spending plan as a boon to the state's biotechnology industry.
The $113 million in deleted projects â€" including $85 million for a health sciences center at the University of Missouri at Columbia â€" makes up about a third of the $335 million in university buildings that would have been funded from the sale of student loans from the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, or MOHELA.
The other projects stripped from the bill are $5.5 million for a research facility associated with Harris-Stowe State University; $5.5 million for the Center for Emerging Technologies incubator associated with the University of Missouri at St. Louis; business incubators in Kansas City and Columbia; and a health science center in Kansas City.
<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stcharles/story/765B177C3F9A630B8625727C001BE5C3?OpenDocument">Stem cell research affects education bill</a> (stltoday.com)
The 6-4 vote in Jefferson City was along party lines, with Republicans in favor of the bill that now moves to the Senate floor. The diminished project list is a blow to Gov. Matt Blunt, who had trumpeted the spending plan as a boon to the state's biotechnology industry.
The $113 million in deleted projects â€" including $85 million for a health sciences center at the University of Missouri at Columbia â€" makes up about a third of the $335 million in university buildings that would have been funded from the sale of student loans from the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, or MOHELA.
The other projects stripped from the bill are $5.5 million for a research facility associated with Harris-Stowe State University; $5.5 million for the Center for Emerging Technologies incubator associated with the University of Missouri at St. Louis; business incubators in Kansas City and Columbia; and a health science center in Kansas City.
<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stcharles/story/765B177C3F9A630B8625727C001BE5C3?OpenDocument">Stem cell research affects education bill</a> (stltoday.com)
A legislative committee offered a preview Wednesday of the contentious and partisan debate ahead over whether the state should fund embryonic stem cell research at the University of Minnesota.
Supporters testified that embryonic research is a promising source of treatment for Parkinson's disease, diabetes and other disorders, but they said it is being slowed by federal funding restrictions.
"Patients are running out of patience," said Jackie Christensen of the Parkinson's Action Network.
Opponents countered that this form of stem cell research is immoral when it involves the destruction of human embryos â€" even when those embryos are left over from fertility procedures.
"It is wrong to rely on the destruction of human beings for the possible benefit of others," said Chris Leifeld of the Minnesota Catholic Conference.
<a href="http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/state/minnesota/16647894.htm">Stem cell bill clears first hurdle in Legislature</a> (twincities.com)
Supporters testified that embryonic research is a promising source of treatment for Parkinson's disease, diabetes and other disorders, but they said it is being slowed by federal funding restrictions.
"Patients are running out of patience," said Jackie Christensen of the Parkinson's Action Network.
Opponents countered that this form of stem cell research is immoral when it involves the destruction of human embryos â€" even when those embryos are left over from fertility procedures.
"It is wrong to rely on the destruction of human beings for the possible benefit of others," said Chris Leifeld of the Minnesota Catholic Conference.
<a href="http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/state/minnesota/16647894.htm">Stem cell bill clears first hurdle in Legislature</a> (twincities.com)
Hollywood director FRANK DARABONT has blasted US President GEORGE W. BUSH's opposition to stem cell research, branding it "preposterous" and "uncompassionate". The SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION and GREEN MILE film-maker is a huge admirer of actor and Parkinson's Disease sufferer MICHAEL J. FOX, and is disgusted the Republican administration is blocking medical research which could potentially save thousands of lives. Darabont tells website MovieHole.net, "I'm very sorry he's dealing with the severe health issues he's been facing. He's very courageous. "Nobody deserves that... except maybe the a**holes in power in this country who are blocking stem cell research at every turn. Those preposterous, uncompassionate turds. "God, if you're listening, let them get sick, we'll see how fast the arguments go away and the funding happens."
<a href="http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/article/darabont%20slams%20bushs%20opposition%20to%20stem%20cell%20research_1021336">DARABONT SLAMS BUSH'S OPPOSITION TO STEM CELL RESEARCH</a> (contactmusic.com)
<a href="http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/article/darabont%20slams%20bushs%20opposition%20to%20stem%20cell%20research_1021336">DARABONT SLAMS BUSH'S OPPOSITION TO STEM CELL RESEARCH</a> (contactmusic.com)
U of M stem cell researcher Dan Kaufman was disappointed when he heard that Gov. Pawlenty would veto stem cell legislation if it didn't contain restrictions on embryonic stem cell research.
"He seems to be backing away from what he said in the campaign where he...pledged to support all types of stem cell research, adult stem cells and human embryonic stem cell research," says Kaufman.
Last fall, Pawlenty said he thought President Bush and Congress should go further than they have on stem cell research. But in a speech to the Minnesota Family Council this week the governor said he does not support "wide-open embryonic stem cell research." He defined wide-open research as using embryos capable of producing human life.
Pawlenty did say he would be OK with using more stem cell lines than what the federal government has approved for research use. These new lines have already been created using private funds. The governor said he was in favor of using the additional lines, because the embryos have either already been destroyed or they are no longer viable.
<a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/02/06/stemcellfolo/">U of M stem cell researchers disagree with Gov. Pawlenty's position on research</a> (Lorna Benson, minnesota.publicradio.org)
"He seems to be backing away from what he said in the campaign where he...pledged to support all types of stem cell research, adult stem cells and human embryonic stem cell research," says Kaufman.
Last fall, Pawlenty said he thought President Bush and Congress should go further than they have on stem cell research. But in a speech to the Minnesota Family Council this week the governor said he does not support "wide-open embryonic stem cell research." He defined wide-open research as using embryos capable of producing human life.
Pawlenty did say he would be OK with using more stem cell lines than what the federal government has approved for research use. These new lines have already been created using private funds. The governor said he was in favor of using the additional lines, because the embryos have either already been destroyed or they are no longer viable.
<a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/02/06/stemcellfolo/">U of M stem cell researchers disagree with Gov. Pawlenty's position on research</a> (Lorna Benson, minnesota.publicradio.org)
Some Missouri lawmakers want a recount on the stem cell amendment that citizens passed last fall.
A House committee Tuesday heard testimony about a new bill that brings up an old issue. Voters passed Amendment 2 in November, but a new bill would ask Missouri voters to reconsider their stance on stem-cell issues.
"In Amendment 2 you had reproductive cloning that was banned. But it allows research and therapeutic cloning. And we believe that the voters of Missouri want to ban all human cloning," said Rep Jim Lembke, St. Louis.
Opponents of the bill say Missourians have already made their choice.
"This proposed resolution would completely undo everything Missouri voters just voted on. It would just undo the will of the people. It would erase the guarantees we have for equal access to medical research, and it would ban, just ban, some of the most promising forms of stem cell research," said Donn Rubin, Missouri Coalition for Lifesaving Cures.
<a href="http://www.komu.com/satellite/SatelliteRender/KOMU.com/c261de75-c0a8-2f11-0163-66f433d41528/99602467-c0a8-2f11-0135-71d68cde19da">Lawmakers Call for New Stem Cell Amendment</a> (komu.com)
A House committee Tuesday heard testimony about a new bill that brings up an old issue. Voters passed Amendment 2 in November, but a new bill would ask Missouri voters to reconsider their stance on stem-cell issues.
"In Amendment 2 you had reproductive cloning that was banned. But it allows research and therapeutic cloning. And we believe that the voters of Missouri want to ban all human cloning," said Rep Jim Lembke, St. Louis.
Opponents of the bill say Missourians have already made their choice.
"This proposed resolution would completely undo everything Missouri voters just voted on. It would just undo the will of the people. It would erase the guarantees we have for equal access to medical research, and it would ban, just ban, some of the most promising forms of stem cell research," said Donn Rubin, Missouri Coalition for Lifesaving Cures.
<a href="http://www.komu.com/satellite/SatelliteRender/KOMU.com/c261de75-c0a8-2f11-0163-66f433d41528/99602467-c0a8-2f11-0135-71d68cde19da">Lawmakers Call for New Stem Cell Amendment</a> (komu.com)
Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty said on Monday that he would veto a bill that used taxpayer funds to pay for embryonic stem cell research because it requires the destruction of human life. He said the state legislature should join him in promoting the use of adult stem cells, the only ones to help patients.
Pawlenty made the comments at a meeting with the Minnesota Family Council, a state pro-life group.
"We should be for certain types of stem cell research," the governor said. "I do not support wide-open embryonic stem cell research."
Pawlenty said he supports adult stem cell research or studies into methods of embryonic stem cell research that don't involve the destruction of human life. He also said he would be open to funding work using embryonic stem cells but only if they currently exist.
What he won't support is new embryonic stem cell research funding where human embryos will be destroyed using tax dollars.
The statement is important because state legislators are considering a bill sponsored by Sen. Dick Cohen, a Democrat, which would fund both adult and embryonic stem cell research.
<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1972.html">Minnesota Gov. Pawlenty Would Veto Embryonic Stem Cell Research Funds </a> (Steven Ertelt, lifenews.com)
Pawlenty made the comments at a meeting with the Minnesota Family Council, a state pro-life group.
"We should be for certain types of stem cell research," the governor said. "I do not support wide-open embryonic stem cell research."
Pawlenty said he supports adult stem cell research or studies into methods of embryonic stem cell research that don't involve the destruction of human life. He also said he would be open to funding work using embryonic stem cells but only if they currently exist.
What he won't support is new embryonic stem cell research funding where human embryos will be destroyed using tax dollars.
The statement is important because state legislators are considering a bill sponsored by Sen. Dick Cohen, a Democrat, which would fund both adult and embryonic stem cell research.
<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1972.html">Minnesota Gov. Pawlenty Would Veto Embryonic Stem Cell Research Funds </a> (Steven Ertelt, lifenews.com)
We are once again sick, this should not seriously surprise anyone, it seems to be a constant theme (slightly dejected sigh insert here). It needs to get warm. Gav is at 100 temp wise and Lulu at 99.8 and I’m not talking vacation spots. Seriously spring: where are you? I long for open windows and a good day at the park. We must be masochists living in Wisconsin. The kids however are living the dream per usual…
Lauren’s prince did come, and his name is daddy. She is all about being with her dad right now. It seems that she enjoys keeping secrets (although she can keep them for a total of three minutes and that’s with hands covering mouth) She is three going on thirteen and I am not sure if she breathes or just has some strong super kid power to talk talk talk! How is it that she has more energy than me even when she has a cold? She truly amazes me. Lauren swears that Gavin told her that he wanted a dog for his birthday. I told her a dog will have to wait until we got a fence and she went downstairs, grabbed a toy hammer and said she and her dad (go figure) could build one. Anyone who knows Jay (bless his heart) knows this is not possible (finance guy, not handy guy), but this just reinforces the daddy love. Her next plan of attack was pet napping the neighbor’s tiny dog. I then informed her stealing dogs is frowned upon and not good for neighborhood relations. Don’t worry; I will check her closets nightly if I hear strange noises.
<a href="http://www.savebabygavin.com/2007/02/06/sick-again-ughsupport-regenerative-medicine-and-stem-cell-research/">Sick Again, Ugh…Support Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research </a> (savebabygavin.com)
Lauren’s prince did come, and his name is daddy. She is all about being with her dad right now. It seems that she enjoys keeping secrets (although she can keep them for a total of three minutes and that’s with hands covering mouth) She is three going on thirteen and I am not sure if she breathes or just has some strong super kid power to talk talk talk! How is it that she has more energy than me even when she has a cold? She truly amazes me. Lauren swears that Gavin told her that he wanted a dog for his birthday. I told her a dog will have to wait until we got a fence and she went downstairs, grabbed a toy hammer and said she and her dad (go figure) could build one. Anyone who knows Jay (bless his heart) knows this is not possible (finance guy, not handy guy), but this just reinforces the daddy love. Her next plan of attack was pet napping the neighbor’s tiny dog. I then informed her stealing dogs is frowned upon and not good for neighborhood relations. Don’t worry; I will check her closets nightly if I hear strange noises.
<a href="http://www.savebabygavin.com/2007/02/06/sick-again-ughsupport-regenerative-medicine-and-stem-cell-research/">Sick Again, Ugh…Support Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research </a> (savebabygavin.com)
This is a transcript from AM. The program is broadcast around Australia at 08:00 on ABC Local Radio.
Reporter: Michael Turtle
TONY EASTLEY: A deal between Sydney University and the Catholic Church means that Australia's largest medical research centre, due for completion in 2012, won't be allowed to do any work on embryonic stem cell research.
The University last night voted to make the concession, in order to get land from the Church for the $350-million institute.
But it doesn't mean that embryonic stem cell research can't be done on other parts of the university campus, as Michael Turtle reports.
MICHAEL TURTLE: As members of the Sydney University senate went into last night's meeting, a group of students were still trying to convince them to vote against the land deal.
ANGUS MCFARLAND: Hello, my name's Angus. I'm the SRC President. We're just having a briefing for Senate fellows about the St John's deed being discussed tonight. We've got some concerns about academic freedom, if you could just...
MICHAEL TURTLE: But it had little effect.
The university's governing body voted overwhelmingly to go ahead with the acquisition of land from St John's College, a Catholic residential complex on the university's grounds.
But there was discussion about the condition in the deal, that no work done on the site could involve the termination or artificial creation of human life.
The undergraduate student representative on the Senate, Rose Jackson, was one of the few to vote against it, for that reason.
ROSE JACKSON: In the world that we live in, particularly the significant advances that can happen in five, 10, 15 years in medical research, to put restrictions now based on what I really believe to be religious convictions on a secular university, I just don't think that's appropriate or smart.
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2007/s1841103.htm">Sydney Uni bans stem cell research on church land</a> (abc.net.au)
Reporter: Michael Turtle
TONY EASTLEY: A deal between Sydney University and the Catholic Church means that Australia's largest medical research centre, due for completion in 2012, won't be allowed to do any work on embryonic stem cell research.
The University last night voted to make the concession, in order to get land from the Church for the $350-million institute.
But it doesn't mean that embryonic stem cell research can't be done on other parts of the university campus, as Michael Turtle reports.
MICHAEL TURTLE: As members of the Sydney University senate went into last night's meeting, a group of students were still trying to convince them to vote against the land deal.
ANGUS MCFARLAND: Hello, my name's Angus. I'm the SRC President. We're just having a briefing for Senate fellows about the St John's deed being discussed tonight. We've got some concerns about academic freedom, if you could just...
MICHAEL TURTLE: But it had little effect.
The university's governing body voted overwhelmingly to go ahead with the acquisition of land from St John's College, a Catholic residential complex on the university's grounds.
But there was discussion about the condition in the deal, that no work done on the site could involve the termination or artificial creation of human life.
The undergraduate student representative on the Senate, Rose Jackson, was one of the few to vote against it, for that reason.
ROSE JACKSON: In the world that we live in, particularly the significant advances that can happen in five, 10, 15 years in medical research, to put restrictions now based on what I really believe to be religious convictions on a secular university, I just don't think that's appropriate or smart.
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2007/s1841103.htm">Sydney Uni bans stem cell research on church land</a> (abc.net.au)
Stem cell research legislation that doesn't explicitly restrict the use of embryonic cells would face a gubernatorial veto, Gov. Tim Pawlenty said Monday, two days before state legislators delve into the issue.
"We should be for certain types of stem cell research," Pawlenty told a gathering of the Minnesota Family Council, adding later, "I do not support wide-open embryonic stem cell research."
He said he'd back state-supported research using discarded umbilical cords, adult cell lines or an emerging method of extracting cells from embryos without damaging them. He also lent support to research on cell lines beyond those restricted by a federal order as long as the embryo is no longer capable of producing human life.
<a href="http://www.wctrib.com/ap/index.cfm?page=view&id=D8N3U2K80&forumcomm_check_return">Bill tests Pawlenty's tailored stance on cell research </a> (wctrib.com)
"We should be for certain types of stem cell research," Pawlenty told a gathering of the Minnesota Family Council, adding later, "I do not support wide-open embryonic stem cell research."
He said he'd back state-supported research using discarded umbilical cords, adult cell lines or an emerging method of extracting cells from embryos without damaging them. He also lent support to research on cell lines beyond those restricted by a federal order as long as the embryo is no longer capable of producing human life.
<a href="http://www.wctrib.com/ap/index.cfm?page=view&id=D8N3U2K80&forumcomm_check_return">Bill tests Pawlenty's tailored stance on cell research </a> (wctrib.com)
There is a lot riding on this week's special election for the SD-7 State Senate Seat. One of those things that is on the line could be life-saving stem cell research. This comes from Daily Kos:
<a href="http://dailygotham.com/blog/mole333/support_stem_cell_research_help_get_craig_johnson_elected">Support Stem Cell Research: Help get Craig Johnson elected</a> (dailygotham.com)
<a href="http://dailygotham.com/blog/mole333/support_stem_cell_research_help_get_craig_johnson_elected">Support Stem Cell Research: Help get Craig Johnson elected</a> (dailygotham.com)
Gov. Jim Doyle met with Democratic members of the U.S. Senate last Wednesday, urging them to pass the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007.
The bill would lift President Bush's current restrictions on stem cell research and expand federal funding to the field, according to a recent press release.
In a Jan. 10 letter to the Wisconsin Congressional delegation, Gov. Doyle laid out his reasons for supporting the bill.
In the letter, he pointed out the medical breakthroughs possible in the field. He also said increasing stem cell research would result in an increase in federal investment in Wisconsin.
"I speak not as the governor of any old state," Doyle said on Wednesday, "but as the governor of the state where stem cell research began and where the best and brightest researchers continue to lead the world."
The proposed bill outlines the provisions that would be needed for embryonic stem cells to be used for research.
<a href="http://media.www.spectatornews.com/media/storage/paper218/news/2007/02/05/CampusNews/Doyle.Urges.Senate.To.Pass.Stem.Cell.Research.Measure-2696710.shtml?sourcedomain=www.spectatornews.com&MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com">Doyle urges Senate to pass stem cell research measure</a> (Timothy Langton, spectatornews.com)
The bill would lift President Bush's current restrictions on stem cell research and expand federal funding to the field, according to a recent press release.
In a Jan. 10 letter to the Wisconsin Congressional delegation, Gov. Doyle laid out his reasons for supporting the bill.
In the letter, he pointed out the medical breakthroughs possible in the field. He also said increasing stem cell research would result in an increase in federal investment in Wisconsin.
"I speak not as the governor of any old state," Doyle said on Wednesday, "but as the governor of the state where stem cell research began and where the best and brightest researchers continue to lead the world."
The proposed bill outlines the provisions that would be needed for embryonic stem cells to be used for research.
<a href="http://media.www.spectatornews.com/media/storage/paper218/news/2007/02/05/CampusNews/Doyle.Urges.Senate.To.Pass.Stem.Cell.Research.Measure-2696710.shtml?sourcedomain=www.spectatornews.com&MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com">Doyle urges Senate to pass stem cell research measure</a> (Timothy Langton, spectatornews.com)
The University of Sydney is considering complying with a church request to ban a new medical research centre from conducting embryonic stem cell research.
The university wants to buy land from the Catholic Church to build the Institute of Health and Medical Research.
The church's deed on the land stipulates there should be no foetal stem cell research or procedures involving the termination of human life or artificial creation of it.
The president of the Student Representative Council, Angus McFarland, says it is outrageous a health and medical research facility would be banned from such research.
"I'm really concerned that is going to be compromising academic freedom," he said.
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1840785.htm">Uni to vote on church's demand for stem cell research ban</a> (abc.net.au)
The university wants to buy land from the Catholic Church to build the Institute of Health and Medical Research.
The church's deed on the land stipulates there should be no foetal stem cell research or procedures involving the termination of human life or artificial creation of it.
The president of the Student Representative Council, Angus McFarland, says it is outrageous a health and medical research facility would be banned from such research.
"I'm really concerned that is going to be compromising academic freedom," he said.
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1840785.htm">Uni to vote on church's demand for stem cell research ban</a> (abc.net.au)
on the last law & order… they had a story called ‘talking points‘
they had a story about a college student that shoots another… while at a political rally for a far far right winger that they categorized as making ann coulter look like mary poppins…
the good stuff was in the trial …
they had the actor playing a parkinsons afflicted 30 something… shaking and trembling around like michael j fox in the court room… bring up the question of someone going off meds for sympathy points…
the show does try to walk the political tightrope… for every 2 left leaning viewpoint.. they do counter with at least 1 conservative view… and the writing.. although.. they are pretty fair and take jabs on both sides.. generally write the conservative character in a condescending way… oh well
during the trial.. the argument was about embryonic stem cells.. and if they were worth killing over because someone was speaking against it…
during cross.. the defense asks a scientist about the prospect of a cure for parkinsons coming from embryonic stem cell research and it if would have benefited his client.. and the scientist posits that there is no conclusive evidence that there will be a cure anytime soon… and that the defendant would probably die before a cure was found..
so… the research that has been going on for this long.. has yielded false hope… with talk about in the next 3-5 years… they want to create stem cells that produce dopamine to address parkinsons… etc..
<a href="http://optionalg.wordpress.com/2007/02/04/stem-cell-defense/">stem cell defense</a> (optionalg.wordpress.com)
they had a story about a college student that shoots another… while at a political rally for a far far right winger that they categorized as making ann coulter look like mary poppins…
the good stuff was in the trial …
they had the actor playing a parkinsons afflicted 30 something… shaking and trembling around like michael j fox in the court room… bring up the question of someone going off meds for sympathy points…
the show does try to walk the political tightrope… for every 2 left leaning viewpoint.. they do counter with at least 1 conservative view… and the writing.. although.. they are pretty fair and take jabs on both sides.. generally write the conservative character in a condescending way… oh well
during the trial.. the argument was about embryonic stem cells.. and if they were worth killing over because someone was speaking against it…
during cross.. the defense asks a scientist about the prospect of a cure for parkinsons coming from embryonic stem cell research and it if would have benefited his client.. and the scientist posits that there is no conclusive evidence that there will be a cure anytime soon… and that the defendant would probably die before a cure was found..
so… the research that has been going on for this long.. has yielded false hope… with talk about in the next 3-5 years… they want to create stem cells that produce dopamine to address parkinsons… etc..
<a href="http://optionalg.wordpress.com/2007/02/04/stem-cell-defense/">stem cell defense</a> (optionalg.wordpress.com)
This past week I stood with Gov. Charlie Crist as he announced his support for $20-million to be spent on stem cell research. His passion for this issue is evident and his willingness to fund such research is a welcomed departure from the position of his predecessor.
At the same time, I am disappointed that he has strayed from his campaign pledge to fund embryonic stem cell research, a stance shared by an overwhelming majority of Americans. It is my hope that he will again return to that position and support House Bill 555, sponsored by Rep. Franklin Sands, D-Weston.
I am proud to be a co-sponsor of HB 555, which creates the Florida Better Quality of Life and Biomedical Research Act. If passed, the bill would allow embryos being discarded by in-vitro fertilization clinics to be used for stem cell research. It would prohibit the purchase or sale of embryonic fetal tissue for research, and ban human reproductive cloning. This proposed legislation calls for the creation of a new state agency to oversee the funding.
<a href="http://www.sptimes.com/2007/02/04/Opinion/Crist_should_go_furth.shtml">Crist should go further on stem cell research</a> (Rep. Rick Kriseman, St. Petersburg, sptimes.com)
At the same time, I am disappointed that he has strayed from his campaign pledge to fund embryonic stem cell research, a stance shared by an overwhelming majority of Americans. It is my hope that he will again return to that position and support House Bill 555, sponsored by Rep. Franklin Sands, D-Weston.
I am proud to be a co-sponsor of HB 555, which creates the Florida Better Quality of Life and Biomedical Research Act. If passed, the bill would allow embryos being discarded by in-vitro fertilization clinics to be used for stem cell research. It would prohibit the purchase or sale of embryonic fetal tissue for research, and ban human reproductive cloning. This proposed legislation calls for the creation of a new state agency to oversee the funding.
<a href="http://www.sptimes.com/2007/02/04/Opinion/Crist_should_go_furth.shtml">Crist should go further on stem cell research</a> (Rep. Rick Kriseman, St. Petersburg, sptimes.com)
State Sen. Chuck Graham called for the Missouri Development Finance Board to go into emergency session to remove a clause that bans embryonic stem cell research inside capitol improvement projects funded with proceeds from the partial asset sale of MOHELA.
Graham said it was wrong for the MDFB to place an "unnecessary and unwise restriction" on the deal.
"Even more troubling is the fact that if the Legislature approves the Omnibus Higher Education Bill (Senate Bill 389) in its current form, the MOHELA/“Lewis & Clark Discovery Initiative†will be bound by any future restrictions approved by the MDFB," Graham said. "I believe professors and other outstanding researchers from across the country will be hesitant to come to a state where an obscure board can place unreasonable restrictions on academic research, and it won’t need legislative approval to do it."
<a href="http://blogs.columbiatribune.com/politics/2007/02/graham_calls_for_meeting_to_ba.html">Graham calls for meeting to banish MOHELA stem cell provision </a> (columbiatribune.com)
Graham said it was wrong for the MDFB to place an "unnecessary and unwise restriction" on the deal.
"Even more troubling is the fact that if the Legislature approves the Omnibus Higher Education Bill (Senate Bill 389) in its current form, the MOHELA/“Lewis & Clark Discovery Initiative†will be bound by any future restrictions approved by the MDFB," Graham said. "I believe professors and other outstanding researchers from across the country will be hesitant to come to a state where an obscure board can place unreasonable restrictions on academic research, and it won’t need legislative approval to do it."
<a href="http://blogs.columbiatribune.com/politics/2007/02/graham_calls_for_meeting_to_ba.html">Graham calls for meeting to banish MOHELA stem cell provision </a> (columbiatribune.com)
While university administrators called it “the most important piece of education legislation in a decade,†a comprehensive bill on college tuition rates and the sale of assets of a college loan program ran into heavy debate before the Senate Education Committee on Wednesday.
University of Missouri System President Elson Floyd and Truman State University President Barbara Dixon both praised the bill sponsored by committee chairman Sen. Gary Nodler, R-Jasper County.
Both university presidents said they support many of the bill’s provisions, including the merging of two need-based financial aid programs into a new Access Missouri Financial Assistance Fund, giving more power to the Coordinating Board for Higher Education and the plan to use $335 million of the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority’s assets to fund new buildings.
“It is critical to higher education and to the people of Missouri that you pass this initiative,†Floyd said to the committee. “It is a creative plan that will move our state forward when it comes to creating jobs, creating better facilities for our students and faculty and advancing research that will improve the lives of Missourians.â€
He added that the UM System Board of Curators passed a resolution in support of the plan and will comply with any requirement to obtain the funds, which includes the prohibition of embryonic stem cell research in any of the buildings that are funded from MOHELA’s assets.
But Sen. Chuck Graham, D-Columbia, criticized Floyd and the curators for their support of the bill and its requirement to prohibit stem cell research. He said that last year Floyd did not support any restrictions against research.
<a href="http://columbiamissourian.com/news/story.php?ID=24013">Senators, UM argue about MOHELA limits, stem cell research</a> (Tina Marie Macias, columbiamissourian.com)
University of Missouri System President Elson Floyd and Truman State University President Barbara Dixon both praised the bill sponsored by committee chairman Sen. Gary Nodler, R-Jasper County.
Both university presidents said they support many of the bill’s provisions, including the merging of two need-based financial aid programs into a new Access Missouri Financial Assistance Fund, giving more power to the Coordinating Board for Higher Education and the plan to use $335 million of the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority’s assets to fund new buildings.
“It is critical to higher education and to the people of Missouri that you pass this initiative,†Floyd said to the committee. “It is a creative plan that will move our state forward when it comes to creating jobs, creating better facilities for our students and faculty and advancing research that will improve the lives of Missourians.â€
He added that the UM System Board of Curators passed a resolution in support of the plan and will comply with any requirement to obtain the funds, which includes the prohibition of embryonic stem cell research in any of the buildings that are funded from MOHELA’s assets.
But Sen. Chuck Graham, D-Columbia, criticized Floyd and the curators for their support of the bill and its requirement to prohibit stem cell research. He said that last year Floyd did not support any restrictions against research.
<a href="http://columbiamissourian.com/news/story.php?ID=24013">Senators, UM argue about MOHELA limits, stem cell research</a> (Tina Marie Macias, columbiamissourian.com)
A public benefit corporation to support stem cell research and development activities across the state would be formed if Gov. Eliot Spitzer gets his way.
Research universities, including the University of Rochester, have been urging its formation for more than a year.
Spitzer has proposed creating the New York State Stem Cell and Innovation Fund Corp. with $100 million in state funds and is asking voters to approve a $1.5 billion bond act to fund stem cell and other life sciences and emerging technologies.
Universities say they urgently need funding for stem cell and other research to retain scientists who might otherwise be lured to states that are developing public sources of funding. California has established a $3 billion fund but has not put programs in place due to pending litigation from opponents of stem cell research.
UR President Joel Seligman said the governor’s proposal would put New York in the lead in stem cell research and scientific innovation.
“The money is absolutely vital to saving lives and advancing our economy,†Seligman said.
<a href="http://www.rbj.net/fullarticle.cfm?sdid=64600">Budget proposes research fund</a> (JANICE BULLARD PIETERSE, rbj.net)
Research universities, including the University of Rochester, have been urging its formation for more than a year.
Spitzer has proposed creating the New York State Stem Cell and Innovation Fund Corp. with $100 million in state funds and is asking voters to approve a $1.5 billion bond act to fund stem cell and other life sciences and emerging technologies.
Universities say they urgently need funding for stem cell and other research to retain scientists who might otherwise be lured to states that are developing public sources of funding. California has established a $3 billion fund but has not put programs in place due to pending litigation from opponents of stem cell research.
UR President Joel Seligman said the governor’s proposal would put New York in the lead in stem cell research and scientific innovation.
“The money is absolutely vital to saving lives and advancing our economy,†Seligman said.
<a href="http://www.rbj.net/fullarticle.cfm?sdid=64600">Budget proposes research fund</a> (JANICE BULLARD PIETERSE, rbj.net)
